CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
The Wisconsin supreme court heard arguments on Tuesday in a case that charges the 2006 referendum that banned same-sex marriage and civil unions was unconstitutional.
The plaintiff, William McConkey, believes the question put to voters in Referendum 1 violated the single-subject law in article XII, section 1 of the Wisconsin constitution.
The referendum stated, "Shall section 13 of article XIII of the constitution be created to provide that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state and that a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state?"
"The real issue today is, as voters is, did we have a right to vote on both questions, and we didn't," said McConkey, reports local Fox affiliate WLUK-TV. "That's the single-subject or the single-purpose rule that was debated here today. They didn't give us a choice."
McConkey's daughter is a lesbian, and he says that is why he is fighting the wording of the referendum. "This isn't a cultural question, this is a constitutional question," added McConkey, who is straight. "If we start to go down the road where a simple majority of one vote can pick out a group of people and strip them of their constitutional rights, then we're really in trouble as a nation."
However, assistant attorney general Lewis Beilin claims that the two parts of the question were closely related and the constitution was correctly amended.
The Wisconsin supreme court is expected to rule by summer.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Health policy expert to RFK Jr.: You can't ban trans youth care this way
December 18 2025 5:37 PM
12 lesbian thrillers and mysteries to binge & where to watch them
December 18 2025 4:36 PM
Netflix's 'Boots' season 2 plot revealed by producer amid cancelation
December 18 2025 4:33 PM
Charlie Kirk's accused killer, Tyler Robinson, on LGBTQ+ issues: It's complicated
December 18 2025 4:04 PM
Sacramento man still in coma six weeks after suspected anti-LGBTQ+ hate crime
December 18 2025 1:17 PM
RFK Jr. and Dr. Oz announce sweeping measures to ban gender-affirming care for trans youth
December 18 2025 12:19 PM
True
Texas city will remove rainbow crosswalks under orders from Trump administration
December 18 2025 11:07 AM
Six key takeaways from Trump's speech to the nation, including 'transgender for everybody'
December 17 2025 10:51 PM
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s bill criminalizing gender-affirming care for minors passes with Democrats’ support
December 17 2025 6:47 PM
True
I didn’t just run the world’s major marathons. I changed them
December 17 2025 4:31 PM
Pam Bondi wants FBI to offer bounties for ‘radical gender ideology’ groups, leaked memo shows
December 17 2025 3:17 PM
Rock Hudson had a 'legendarily large penis,' Armistead Maupin says
December 17 2025 3:05 PM




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes