CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
The Wisconsin supreme court heard arguments on Tuesday in a case that charges the 2006 referendum that banned same-sex marriage and civil unions was unconstitutional.
The plaintiff, William McConkey, believes the question put to voters in Referendum 1 violated the single-subject law in article XII, section 1 of the Wisconsin constitution.
The referendum stated, "Shall section 13 of article XIII of the constitution be created to provide that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state and that a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state?"
"The real issue today is, as voters is, did we have a right to vote on both questions, and we didn't," said McConkey, reports local Fox affiliate WLUK-TV. "That's the single-subject or the single-purpose rule that was debated here today. They didn't give us a choice."
McConkey's daughter is a lesbian, and he says that is why he is fighting the wording of the referendum. "This isn't a cultural question, this is a constitutional question," added McConkey, who is straight. "If we start to go down the road where a simple majority of one vote can pick out a group of people and strip them of their constitutional rights, then we're really in trouble as a nation."
However, assistant attorney general Lewis Beilin claims that the two parts of the question were closely related and the constitution was correctly amended.
The Wisconsin supreme court is expected to rule by summer.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Is Texas using driver's license data to track transgender residents?
December 15 2025 6:46 PM
Rachel Maddow on standing up to government lies and her Walter Cronkite Award
December 15 2025 3:53 PM
Beloved gay 'General Hospital' star Anthony Geary dies at age 78
December 15 2025 2:07 PM
Rob Reiner deserves a place in queer TV history for Mike 'Meathead' Stivic in 'All in the Family'
December 15 2025 1:30 PM
Culver City elects first out gay mayor — and Elphaba helped celebrate
December 15 2025 1:08 PM
Texas city cancels 2026 Pride after local council rescinds LGBTQ+ protections
December 15 2025 12:55 PM
North Carolina county dissolves library board for refusing to toss book about a trans kid
December 15 2025 11:45 AM
Florida and Texas launch 'legal attack' in push to restrict abortion medication nationally
December 15 2025 11:18 AM
No, Crumbl is not Crumbl-ing, gay CEO Sawyer Hemsley says
December 15 2025 10:12 AM
11 times Donald Trump has randomly brought up his ‘transgender for everybody’ obsession
December 15 2025 9:22 AM
The story queer survivors aren't allowed to tell
December 15 2025 6:00 AM
Rob Reiner, filmmaker and marriage equality advocate, and wife Michele dead in apparent homicide
December 15 2025 1:08 AM




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes