CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2026 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
The Wisconsin supreme court heard arguments on Tuesday in a case that charges the 2006 referendum that banned same-sex marriage and civil unions was unconstitutional.
The plaintiff, William McConkey, believes the question put to voters in Referendum 1 violated the single-subject law in article XII, section 1 of the Wisconsin constitution.
The referendum stated, "Shall section 13 of article XIII of the constitution be created to provide that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state and that a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state?"
"The real issue today is, as voters is, did we have a right to vote on both questions, and we didn't," said McConkey, reports local Fox affiliate WLUK-TV. "That's the single-subject or the single-purpose rule that was debated here today. They didn't give us a choice."
McConkey's daughter is a lesbian, and he says that is why he is fighting the wording of the referendum. "This isn't a cultural question, this is a constitutional question," added McConkey, who is straight. "If we start to go down the road where a simple majority of one vote can pick out a group of people and strip them of their constitutional rights, then we're really in trouble as a nation."
However, assistant attorney general Lewis Beilin claims that the two parts of the question were closely related and the constitution was correctly amended.
The Wisconsin supreme court is expected to rule by summer.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Is there a link between autism and being transgender? Here's what the science says
January 02 2026 9:00 AM
The films of bisexual actor Anthony Perkins: Beyond Psycho's Norman Bates
January 02 2026 7:00 AM
All about the Mattachine Society, the first enduring U.S. gay rights group
January 01 2026 8:00 AM
Canceled shows and record lows: How Trump is killing the Kennedy Center
January 01 2026 7:00 AM
As groundbreaking trans politician Andrea Jenkins retires, a look at her life and career
December 31 2025 5:49 PM
9 queer celebrities who made us proud in 2025
December 31 2025 4:35 PM
9 viral queer moments of 2025: From Nicki's right turn, to the 'Funeral Stud'
December 31 2025 4:30 PM
Kellyanne Conway says Trump critics need a husband — including lesbian Rosie O'Donnell
December 31 2025 2:54 PM
San Francisco green-lights affordable housing for LGBTQ+ seniors
December 31 2025 11:45 AM




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes