Bill to Protect GLB Workers Advances Without the T

Democrats on Thursday sent to the full House legislation that would prohibit workplace discrimination against gays, lesbians, and bisexuals, despite bitter complaints from some because transgender workers would not be protected under the bill.

Democratic leaders pushed forward the current bill after discovering that including transgender workers in the legislation would cause it to fail in the full House, and promised to try and get additional legislation in the future.

''I believe that the step we are taking today will lay the foundation for passing these additional protections in the future,'' said Democrat George Miller of California, chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee.

But the exclusion of gender identity in the bill has caused a divisive split in the Democratic Party, with some saying they should take advantage of the Democrats' numerical superiority in the House to pass the first-ever federal workplace protection for gays, lesbians, and bisexuals. Others say the Employment Non-Discrimination Act should include everyone in the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender population.

''We won't support ENDA until all Americans are included,'' said Christopher Anders, the senior legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. ''Nobody should be cut out or left behind simply because Democratic leadership is too impatient to round up the votes needed to pass a comprehensive bill.''

Four Democrats -- Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, Rush Holt of New Jersey, Linda Sanchez of California, and Yvette Clarke of New York -- voted against the bill because of its exclusion of gender identity. ''We could have done better,'' Sanchez said.

Rep. Lynn Woolsey, a California Democrat, said some Democrats led by Rep. Tammy Baldwin will try to include transgender-worker protection with an amendment on the House floor before a final vote.

The committee passed the bill 27-21, with all but four of the Republican members voting against the bill.

''When you strive to protect some people, you take away protections of other people,'' said Rep. Howard ''Buck'' McKeon, a Republican from California. ''That is the difficulty, and I think some of us on this side are representing some of those people that feel like as good as your intentions are, you're taking away their rights in their religious beliefs and dealings on a day-to-day basis.''

''Sexual orientation is not the same as race, gender, or age, which do not depend on perception at all,'' said Rep. Mark Souder, an Indiana Republican. ''This is a possible litigation nightmare, where perceptions are enough to cause lawsuits resulting to a hostile workplace for those with moral or religious concerns regarding homosexuality.''

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act would make it illegal for employers to make decisions about hiring, firing, promoting, or paying an employee based on sexual orientation. Churches and the military would be exempt.

Federal law bans job discrimination based on factors such as race, gender and religion.

Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have laws against sexual orientation discrimination. However, only nine states specifically protect transgender people from discrimination: New Jersey, Minnesota, Rhode Island, New Mexico, California, Illinois, Maine, Hawaii, and Washington. The District of Columbia also has a similar law.

By January laws also will be in effect in Iowa, Vermont, Colorado and Oregon. (Jesse J. Holland, AP)