I’m interrupting my Transgender 101 Series to pass along some big news for transgender people from this week’s release of the 2006 Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index (CEI) and the Out and Equal 2006 Workplace Summit in mid September.
HRC gave those of us attending the Out and Equal Summit a sneak peak at the 2006 CEI results released on September 19. The annual CEI is a tool to measure how equitably companies are treating their gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees, consumers, and investors. Scoring 100% each year is rapidly becoming essential for major employers.
This year, HRC raised the bar to include transgender parity in at least one of five wellness benefits, and the results are exciting. Of the 446 companies in the survey, a total of 303 companies offer at least one of the specified benefits for their transgender employees, and a staggering 67 offer all five. More impressively, 28% of the employers provide health benefits for trans-related surgical procedures.
HRC told us that some companies are surprised to find that their health insurance coverage excludes gender identity-related treatments. The language is often in the master policy because it is the “standard” offering from the insurance company. Once employers learn this, it is often only a matter of demanding that their insurers remove the exclusion.
The exclusion is standard because of fears over the cost of inclusion. But Mary Ann Horton, in her eye-opening Out and Equal session on "The Cost of Transgender Health Benefits," showed convincingly that the cost is considerably less than that of domestic partner coverage, even when taking into account a generous margin of error.
Horton backed up her calculations with the experience of the City and Country of San Francisco, which has provided comprehensive transgender health coverage since 2001. Their actuaries knew there were 27 transgender municipal employees, and therefore geared up to pay for 35 surgeries each year. But they missed the fact that some transgender people never have surgery and those that do generally only have it once in a lifetime. Actual cost experience has been no worse than that for gall bladder removal or heart surgery.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.