
Mike Jones, a male escort from Denver, says he revealed his “sexual business relationship” with evangelical leader Ted Haggard (pictured) to expose the hypocrisy in Haggard’s support for a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage. But he says he doesn’t wish the prominent pastor any ill will.
Haggard, a married father of five and a close personal advisor to President Bush, resigned his post as president of the 30-million member National Association of Evangelicals on November 2 and has taken a leave from his job as pastor of the 14,000-member New Life Church in Colorado Springs, Colo. He has since admitted to some “indiscretions,” including going to Jones for a massage and later purchasing crystal meth from him, but has denied a sexual relationship. Haggard put himself on leave from his church “to allow a panel of four senior pastors, ‘wise ones,’ and spiritual men to oversee the circumstances,” his attorney, Martin Nussbaum, told The Advocate.
Jones alleges Haggard has been paying for sex with him and doing drugs for the last three years. He spoke with The Advocate about his contact with Haggard, the first time he learned of Haggard’s real identity, and why he came forward.
Why now, just days before the midterm election?
I really agonized over it for quite a while and
finally decided I needed to say something. People have
accused me of trying to get money out of [Haggard]. I
will tell you that if I wanted to get money out of him, I
could have blackmailed him. I chose not to do that, but to
do this on principle, for the gay community. We have
two initiatives coming up on [the
Colorado] ballot, one to amend the constitution [to ban
same-sex marriage] and one for domestic-partnership rights.
People have accused me of being a puppet, but I have
had no contact with any political organization
whatsoever on this. I just did it myself.
Did the scandal surrounding former congressman Mark
Foley influence your decision?
No.
When did you first meet Ted Haggard?
Roughly three years ago. I never asked him how
he found my number, but I guess it was from a Web site
or a newspaper somewhere, because I was advertising at
the time as a male escort. When I answered the phone, he
indicated he was visiting from Kansas City and that his name
was Art. For the first year, he called from a blocked
number, then mostly from pay phones from the Colorado
Springs area.
When did you first realize who he was?
In the spring of 2006. I was lying on the couch,
relaxing, watching the History Channel—a show
on the DaVinci Code and the antichrist. All of a
sudden, his face came up. They were interviewing him. It was
Art. I didn’t get his name, so in my mind I was
thinking, I’m going to order a copy of this
show, just so I can see who this guy is. To me it was a
coincidence. The very next morning at 5 a.m., I was at the
gym working out on the treadmill. Somebody the night
before had turned the TV to the religious channel and
there he was. When I got home and looked him up on the
computer, I was like, “Ted Haggard…oh,
crap…this guy’s huge.”
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.