Continental promo
|| Home > Politics  ||
 

Advocate election returns

November 7, 2006: Check here for up-to-the-minute returns to selected elections and ballot questions important to gays and lesbians across the country.
An Advocate.com exclusive posted November 7, 2006
Advocate election returns

Election returns for selected races and referendums as of 12:26 p.m. Wednesday EST:

U.S. House of Representatives

Massachusetts, 4th congressional district

Barney Frank (gay/Democratic incumbent)

(Running unopposed)

 

Wisconsin, 2nd congressional district

Tammy Baldwin (gay/Democratic incumbent): 63%

David Magnum (Republican challenger): 37%

(100% of precincts reporting)

 

California, 27th congressional district

Peter Hankwitz (gay/Republican challenger): 31%

Brad Sherman (Democrat): 69%

(100% of precincts reporting)

 

California, 52nd congressional district

John Rinaldi (gay/Democratic challenger): 31%

Duncan Hunter (Republican): 66%

(82% of precincts reporting)

 

Ohio, 1st congressional district

John Cranley (Democratic challenger): 47%

Steve Chabot (Republican incumbent): 53%

(100% of precincts reporting)

 

Minnesota, 6th congressional district

Patty Wetterling (Democrat): 42%

Michele Bachmann (Republican): 50%

(97% of precincts reporting)

 

Colorado, 4th congressional district

Marilyn Musgrave (Republican incumbent): 46%

Angie Paccione (Democratic challenger): 43%

(99% of precincts reporting)

 

U.S. Senate

Pennsylvania

Bob Casey Jr. (Democratic challenger): 59%

Rick Santorum (Republican incumbent): 41%

(99% of precincts reporting)

 

Gubernatorial

California

Phil Angelides (Democratic challenger): 39%

Arnold Schwarzenegger (Republican incumbent): 56%

(93% of precincts reporting)

 

New York

Eliot Spitzer (Democrat): 69%

John Faso (Republican): 29%

(99% of precincts reporting)

 

Massachusetts

Deval Patrick (Democrat): 56%

Kerry Healey (Republican): 35%

(100% of precincts reporting)

Illinois

Rod Blagojevich (Democrat): 49%

Judy Baar Topinka (Republican): 40%

(98% of precincts reporting)

 

Prosposed state constitutional bans on same-sex marriage and, in some instances, all legal recognition of unmarried couples

Arizona, Proposition 107

Yes: 49%

No: 51%

(99% of precincts reporting)

 

Colorado, Amendment 43

Yes: 56%

No: 44%

(88% of precincts reporting)

 

Idaho, Amendment 2

Yes: 63%

No: 37%

(92% of precincts reporting)

 

South Carolina, Amendment 1

Yes: 78%

No: 22%

(99% of precincts reporting)

 

South Dakota, Amendment C

Yes: 52%

No: 48%

(100% precincts reporting)

 

Tennessee, Amendment 1

Yes: 81%

No: 19%

(99% of precincts reporting)

 

Virginia, Amendment 1

Yes: 57%

No: 43%

(99% of precincts reporting)

 

Wisconsin, Question 1

Yes: 59%

No: 41%

(99% precincts reporting)

 

State referendums that would provide legal recognition to same-sex couples

Colorado, Referendum I: Domestic Partnership

Yes: 47%

No: 53%

(88% of precincts reporting)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

Error:Server capacity reached.
Error:Server capacity reached.
Error:Server capacity reached. Subscribe to the digital edition. Subscribe to the print edition.
Error:Server capacity reached.