Page:
1
| 2
| 3
Matt Foreman, who announced January 23 that he would be resigning as executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, was many things during his five years at the top of one of the country’s preeminent gay rights organizations. He was an outspoken opponent of the war in Iraq. He fought against privatizing Social Security. He stood foursquare against the erosion of abortion rights.
But what any of these issues have to do with lobbying for gay rights -- presumably Foreman’s job description -- is beyond me.
His job description, though, was the problem. Foreman, after all, is just a symptom of the larger problem with NGLTF: It's a garden-variety liberal interest group posing as a gay rights organization. In its mission statement, NGLTF defines itself as forming "part of a broader social justice movement," meaning that it seeks alliances with an array of left-wing groups, from labor unions to pro-choice organizations. Its worldview -- which will be on display at its annual Creating Change conference in Detroit starting February 7 -- is formed by a combination of academic "queer theory" and Marxist rhetoric about "systems of oppression." According to this outlook, the United States -- and Western, liberal capitalist societies in general -- are predicated on "oppressing" the poor, nonwhites, "queers," and everyone else who isn't a white male. So the battle for gay rights suddenly becomes part and parcel of the battle to redistribute wealth, weaken American sovereignty by making the United States subservient to the whims of the United Nations, and mandating racial quotas. In this vision of the world, the fight for gay rights is inseparable from the campaign to, say, oppose welfare reform.
There is, of course, nothing inconsistent with being gay and liberal -- the same can be said of being gay and conservative, but that’s a point neither NGLTF nor its ideological allies would ever concede -- yet the group's crucial error is the conflation of liberalism with the very notion of gay rights itself. There are two problems with this approach. First, it renders conservatism and gay rights mutually exclusive, which is false and divisive. There are plenty of elected Republicans in this country -- even at the federal level -- who are supportive of gay rights while holding conservative viewpoints on taxes, foreign policy, and social programs. They should be embraced by gay rights groups, not scorned, especially at a time when antigay sentiment is receding in the GOP.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.
Home | Contact | Current Issue | LGBT Community Partners | Staff
Career Opportunities | Help
Subscribe: Print Edition Digital Edition | Subscriber Services: Print Edition Digital Edition
Visit our Websites
Out.com | OutTraveler.com | HIVPlusMag.com | Alyson.com | HereTV.com | GayWired.com | SheWired.com
Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Community Guidelines | Legal Notice
Advocate.com © 2009 Regent Entertainment Media Inc. All Rights Reserved.
