Continental promo
|| News > News  ||
 

Going to the Chapel, Again

Meet four same-sex couples who took the plunge in San Francisco in 2004 and learn why they can't wait to walk down the aisle one more time.
An Advocate.com exclusive posted June 5, 2008
Going to the Chapel, Again

The rapturous crowd that swarmed San Francisco City Hall in February 2004 -- only to have their same-sex unions annulled four months later -- may turn out to be the most married group in America. Many had already had private marriages or commitment ceremonies before the blitz on City Hall and now plan to marry again now that the California supreme court has overturned the state’s ban on same-sex marriages.

“I’ll get married in every state if I have to,” says performer Heather Gold. As a Canadian, Heather was able to marry her partner in Canada last December. When the California supreme court ruling came down, “my first call was to Stacey,” she says. “My second was to the caterer.”

Writer Jewelle Gomez, who was turned away -- license in hand -- when the marriages were halted in 2004, remembers the excitement of that time. “I walked up and down the line outside City Hall,” she says. “I hugged people I knew. I hugged people I didn’t know.”

The Advocate found that thrill has been renewed by the court’s May decision. Here are four couples -- married four years ago -- who now plan to retie the knot.

Phyllis Lyon Del Martin (Liz Mangkesdorf, SF Chron provided by NCLR) x395 | Advocate.com  

Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon

Lesbian icons Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon have been together 55 years. Their lifelong political activism made them a perfect choice to lead the charge in 2004. Kate Kendell, head of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, invited them to City Hall. “They made it easy on us,” Phyllis recalls. “They came to pick us up.” She and Del were the first same-sex couple to be married in San Francisco. “They kept it pretty secret because they didn’t want their enemies to rush to court,” she says. “The next day there were a lot of people there.”

Phyllis believes that gays and lesbians have a better chance of defeating an anti–gay marriage ballot initiative in California this November than they did in 2000. “In the eight years since that vote, a lot of young people have grown up and are voting, and gay marriage is not a big problem for them,” she says. “Also, more adults have met gay and lesbian people and they know more about us. So I think we have a good chance. We have to work hard. It is our right to marry.”

Page: 1 | 2
Marler is freelance writer based in San Francisco and a frequent contributor to The Advocate.
Keywords:  california marriage  marriage 

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Nik
    Date posted: 2008-06-16 7:29 PM
    Hometown: Concord

    Comment:

    Congratulations to all the couples that will say "I do" in the following days! I'd like to thank Del and Phyllis for the strength it must have taken to continue the fight to see this day - again. Being a straight single mother, I am proud that I can tell my children today that their world is finally beginning to change for the better. I will be voting for equality in November! Much love to all of you - thank you for helping to give us all a more loving place to live.


  • Name: Deena
    Date posted: 2008-06-16 5:56 PM
    Hometown: Nashua

    Comment:

    Congratulations! To Phyllis and Del, from way back East in New Hampshire. I used to receive a copy of "The "Ladder" years ago, and enjoyed it so much. Everyone was closeted then, and though we've come a long way, we still have such a long way to go! Thanks to these two, who paved a smoother path for those to follow, and thanks to them, for setting the example they did, taking the risks to speak out that they did. Thank you for all you've done!


  • Name: Scott
    Date posted: 2008-06-09 3:23 PM
    Hometown: Oxnard, CA

    Comment:

    My (now) fiance and I were married in 2004 and will be marrying again this fall. The difference between then and now? We won't look like drowned rats after waiting in the rain all night. This time there is plenty of time to plan it. Our families will be there. And maybe the most important thing, I know more now than I did then. I didn't expect that marriage to be upheld. I was there to strike a blow, to make a statement. I didn't realize that standing there, repeating vows and looking into the eyes of the man I've loved these last 16 years would hit me so hard and so deep. As I repeated the words, I didn't care about striking a blow. And when the Supreme Court ruled - as I'd known they would - that our marriage was invalid, I didn't know it would cut like that. We're getting married - again or for the first time doesn't matter - and I know going in that being married matters on a very personal level, at least to me and mine.


  • Name: Linda
    Date posted: 2008-06-06 12:58 AM
    Hometown: Chico

    Comment:

    I am so excited for all of us as a community! My partner and myself were the sixth couple married in San Francisco...we were so very excited, as we are now for this opportunity! We have many friends planning their weddings and taking on this fight so that it is not overturned in November. Congratulations to all of us, and keep up the fight! Linda and Vickie, Chico, CA.


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.