Continental promo
< Back Comments (9)Post a Comment Bookmark and Share   Page: 1 | 2 | 3
 

Gay Marriage: An Electoral Liability

California's vote against same-sex marriage was one negative consequence of Obama's victory.
An Advocate.com exclusive posted November 5, 2008
Gay Marriage: An Electoral Liability

Amid the euphoria around Obama's tremendous victory, gay men and women across America will find it difficult to contain their disappointment, anger, and a painful sense of betrayal. The success of Proposition 8, a ballot initiative that amends California's state constitution to define marriage as only between a man and a woman, shows that despite all the gains we still rank low when it comes to the struggle for equality.

Six months after the California supreme court struck down the state's ban on same-sex marriage, unleashing a wave of gay weddings, it's like waking up to find that we're still the misunderstood problem child that other kids shun in the playground. There will be a lot of soul-searching in the weeks to come, but the fact is that gay Americans remain an electoral liability for Democrats whose support remains largely tepid, often crystallizing only after they've left office.

That's why it was safe for Bill Clinton to lend his support to the "no" campaign in the last few weeks, despite his advice to John Kerry in 2004 to back local bans on gay marriage and the federal Defense of Marriage Act that he signed into law in 1996. And it explains why Obama played such an awkward dance of being for equality, but against gay marriage. On MTV last weekend he said Prop. 8 was "unnecessary" (gee, thanks!) while reiterating his opposition to marriage equality, a stance that played into the hands of Prop. 8 campaigners, who used his words in their TV ads and campaign literature. We kvetched about that, but who can blame them? That's politics. 

Page: 1 | 2 | 3
Hicklin is the editorial director of Regent Media.
Keywords:  2008 Election  California marriage  Prop 8 
Related stories from Advocate.com

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Josh
    Date posted: 2008-11-11 11:49 PM
    Hometown: Los Angeles

    Comment:

    It should be noted, that rights belong to individuals, not to groups; and that no definition infringes upon anyone's rights. For example: Prop 8 did not prohibit gay men from entering into the civil institution with a woman known as marriage, nor did it infringe upon his 'lifestyle.' There is a difference between men and women, and therefore a difference between a gay couple, a lesbian couple, and a heterosexual couple; to call all three of these the same thing is to say that men are the same as women (not merely equal to). In truth, 'gay marriage' cannot be opposed any more than any other true oxymoron.


  • Name: lionel
    Date posted: 2008-11-06 9:24 PM
    Hometown: los angeles

    Comment:

    Don, as a Catholic Black Dem in Los Angeles, I hope we can bring the blessings of a Prop 8 to your state soon. And CT while we're at it.


  • Name: scott
    Date posted: 2008-11-06 4:25 PM
    Hometown: oweg, ny

    Comment:

    Well.... I didn't support him. I watched a couple of interviews LIVE where both Joe Biden ( a man I've always admired) and Barak Obama (another man I admired) said they are against gay marriage about two weeks before the election. That did it for me. Right there and then I changed my vote to Ralph Nader. He's openly supportive of gay marriage. He doesn't pander. It' absolutely INFURIATING that the Democratic candidates can openly tell me on live tv that they do NOT support my right to marry and still expect me to give them my vote and support. SCREW THEM!!!


  • Name: Anton
    Date posted: 2008-11-06 3:28 PM
    Hometown: Asheville

    Comment:

    Perhaps the article's tagline could be stated more fairly. The passing of Prop 8 was not the result of an Obama victory. This is dangerously oversimplifying the matter. It was the result of ignorance and bigotry promoted by a religious institution through a massive ad campaign whose strategy was fear. If I recall correctly, we were winning this thing in the polls until the Mormon Church poured funds into Yes on 8. Polls are usually conducted with either registered voters or likely voters. Thus if the embers of fear and intolerance hadn't been stoked by the ads, people might've looked past their prejudices and defeated this hateful amendment.


  • Name: David
    Date posted: 2008-11-06 2:51 PM
    Hometown: Austin, TX

    Comment:

    To Kill T.: Your comments are gross, vile, and absolutely full of hate. When you are filled with such vitriol for one marginalized community, how do you expect anyone else to recognize your humanity as a queer person. Not only are you a bigot, but you hide behind false names; you are nothing but a coward and a filthy example of a human being. With people like you out there, may God have mercy on all of us!


  • Name: David
    Date posted: 2008-11-06 2:47 PM
    Hometown: Austin, TX

    Comment:

    As a queer latino activist myself, I am sick and tired of WHITE gay men and lesbians always wanting to bemoan our losses and lay full (or a majority) of the blame on so-called socially conservative Black and Brown communities. Need I remind you that it was conservative WHITE churches that put this proposition on the ballot and then decided to court religious communities of color. Meanwhile, the WHITE gay community did near to NOTHING in communities of color (like they usually do). Your racism is equally to blame because how can both sides (white gays and straight folks of color) work together when they are both standing on each other's neck. Then queer folks of color are left in the middle marginalized and scorned on both sides looking at both houses, both communities burn to the ground in their hatred for one another. Yes, it was hatred, intolerance, and ignorance that helped pass Prop 8, but it was both HOMOPHOBIA and RACISM that helped pass the measure and prevented coalition work.


  • Name: Lorelei
    Date posted: 2008-11-06 12:44 PM
    Hometown: Providence

    Comment:

    I assume that this story is about the importance of Hickland, because, gee... the portrait-studio photo of his face is so much BIGGER than the text of the STORY. Narcissism, anyone?


  • Name: Don Gorton
    Date posted: 2008-11-06 9:23 AM
    Hometown: Boston

    Comment:

    The exit poll results paint a jarring picture. While we cannot erase the fact that the African-American vote went 70% in favor of discrimination, we must be careful to avoid a racist backlash in our community. The problem is religiously-based homophobia, most fierce among the Mormons. We are entitled to our anger, but we must move beyond it to erase Proposition 8 from the California consitution. Ultimately, our love is more potent than their hate.


  • Name: Paul
    Date posted: 2008-11-05 7:35 PM
    Hometown: Tampa

    Comment:

    Thank you, Aaron, for a well stated article that touches on all the things I'm thinking and feeling. It would be wonderful, now that he's safely President-elect, if Obama would issue a statement at least recognizing what a traumatic and disappointing evening last night was for a community that gave him overwhelming support in the election.


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.