Issue Number 942 | Mom, I kind of like him | Advocate.com "Mom, I kind of like him"  | News | Advocate.com

Continental promo
|| News > News  ||
 

"Mom, I kind of like him"

From The Advocate  July 5, 2005

When I was 10 I asked my mother to buy me two record albums for my birthday. Two movie musical soundtracks (first clue). One was for the Oscar-winning Oliver!—a respectable enough choice, even today. The other was for the low-budget kids’ film Pufnstuf, the big-screen version of a cheesy Saturday morning television show about a boy named Jimmy who is marooned on a magic island where a bumbling witch wants to get her hands on his golden flute.

Pufnstuf starred British teen heartthrob Jack Wild, who was the Artful Dodger in Oliver! “I kind of like him,” I remember telling my mother while we were shopping at the Meijer Thrifty Acres in Grand Rapids, Mich., circa 1970.

It felt weird to say that out loud, although I didn’t know why it should.

I got the records, which I added to the Partridge Family and Donny Osmond albums I already had (second clue). I played the Pufnstuf soundtrack repeatedly and sang along to Mama Cass’s song “Different”: “Different is hard, different is lonely / Different is trouble for you only / Different is heartache, different is pain / But I’d rather be different than be the same.”

Mama Cass was singing about being an overweight witch. It didn’t occur to me until years later that the song had a rather glaring gay subtext.

It also didn’t occur to me—nor, I suspect, to my mother—that my attraction to that “older man,” Jack Wild, had anything to do with my future sexual identity. Digging Jack was a compelling orientation for my 10-year-old self, but it wasn’t sexual. I didn’t want to touch his flute or sneak kisses behind Pufnstuf’s pad or settle down and adopt baby dragons together. I just wanted to be his best friend. (“A Friend in You” was another track on the Pufnstuf album.)

By the time hormones hit, I’d put away Jack, Donny, and Keith Partridge in favor of Alice Cooper, David Bowie, and Elton John (third clue). When I developed a secret crush on a blond diver who rode the same bus to high school that I did, I finally got to thinking about something other than just being best friends.

Most gay and lesbian adults have stories like this—clues to future sexuality that often have nothing to do with sex. Photographer Robert Trachtenberg has even compiled many of them in a highly entertaining new book called When I Knew (featured in our May 24 issue). To us, these tales are proof enough that being gay is not a choice, that it’s integral to our psychology and biology.

They are not scientific proof, however. That’s more complicated, and it’s a quest to which many great minds are dedicating years of research, as this issue’s cover story reports.

As that story and our own personal stories show, sexuality is interwoven with so many aspects of our selves—including, apparently, our sense of smell—that it’s unlikely to be attributable to any single gene or formative moment. And that’s a good thing. Because while the discovery of genetic links to sexual identity may give us an “I told you so” satisfaction and perhaps a political too in fighting for equality, it should never supplant the joyful image of a little boy singing “I’d rather be different” along with Mama Cass.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.