It’s the first hot day of 2008 in Los Angeles -- upward of 90 degrees, and it’s only April -- and I’m hiking in dusty Runyon Canyon in the Hollywood hills with Thomas Roberts, the former CNN anchor turned Insider correspondent. Halfway up a moderately rugged climb, both wheezing a bit, we spot a secluded ridge off the main path, safely removed from the dogs and owners and shirtless runners enjoying the late-afternoon sunshine. We stand still for a moment and take in the commanding view from downtown in the east to the Pacific in the west. The vast metropolis, bustling with kinetic dreams up close, lies before us in a state of startling clarity. The only thing moving is an airplane in the distance.
The peaceful tableau is a good match for the calm, confident demeanor of Roberts, a major talent who’s weathered some career turbulence of late. It started in 2006, when his appearance on a panel of gay broadcast journalists was picked up by a blog. The “news” quickly turned into a coming-out of the first order -- even though Roberts was already out at CNN. Never mind: He was now an official gay celebrity, and along with the affection came the opposite -- the rumors, innuendos, and downright trash talk hurled at anyone in the public eye these days. When Roberts left CNN a year ago this May, people speculated that the cable news behemoth parted ways with him because of his sexuality. Then, when he started on the air at The Insider a few months later, in September 2007, a blogger posted pictures that were purportedly from Roberts’s Manhunt profile -- a nasty hit that was splashed across the top of the New York Post gossip column Page Six.
A tall, muscular, classic hunk of a man, Roberts is the all-American matinee-idol version of a broadcaster, as opposed to, say, Anderson Cooper’s effete, almost European vibe. But Roberts isn’t talking to me today to name names or speculate about other people’s careers and choices. He’s here simply to talk about his own experience being gay in broadcasting -- which, for the most part, has been positive, despite what you may think.
“It’s funny that people think I got fired from CNN,” he says, addressing the prevailing rumor about him. “I left CNN on my accord: I resigned from my contract because of personal reasons.” During his six years at the channel, he says, “I never dealt with anything but respect and kindness. There’s a great misconception.”
Indeed, Roberts says, being gay has never held him back. “I’ve worked my ass off, I’ve been fortunate, and luck doesn’t hurt either,” he says. “If people don’t like that I’m gay or that I talk about being gay, I’m sorry. Because that’s not my problem.”
The glaring absence of openly gay television anchors at the networks, on cable, and in local markets across the country is most obvious in the case of the CNN and 60 Minutes silver fox, who delivers the facts on everything except his sexuality. But when you turn your attention away from him and scan the ranks of America’s newsreaders, you notice Cooper has lots of company.
According to longtime industry talent agent Mendes J. Napoli, there are only two openly gay main news anchors currently working in the top 20 U.S. television markets: Randy Price at Boston’s WHDH and Craig Stevens at Miami’s WSVN. On cable news there’s one: Jason Bellini of CBS News on Logo. And on the networks? None.
In the correspondent and reporter corps, the numbers are higher -- NBC News’s John Yang and ABC News’s Jeffrey Kofman and Miguel Marquez are a few of the big names, though there are countless others at all levels of TV. (And -- let’s get this out of the way -- there’s CNN’s Richard Quest, recently busted on charges of loitering in Central Park after hours with meth in his pocket.)
Yet when it comes to being the face of a news division, the glass ceiling is barely smudged. “You can be a morning anchor, a weekend anchor, an afternoon anchor, a reporter -- they love gay reporters now because they’re so animated, they’re not stiff,” says Napoli, who represents Stevens. “But a primary male anchor who’s gay? It’s an issue.”
The reason, he says, is simple: The decision makers are middle-aged white men. “Ninety-nine percent of main anchor decisions end up on the desk of an older white male manager, who is not going to view gay men the same way other people might.” Plus, Napoli says, “There’s a fear that the audience will reject them.”
“It’s uncharted territory,” says “Jake,” an anchor in a major media market who, in exchange for anonymity, spoke to me candidly about his experience being gay but not out. “Maybe I should have the attitude of ‘I am gay -- take it or leave it.’ But in the back of your mind, there’s always that thing: the culture of the industry.” The business is rife with gay talent, from executives on down -- “tons,” according to Jake. But television is also a fundamentally conservative, risk-averse world. “It’s OK if they know within the company,” Jake says, “but you wouldn’t do a cover story with The Advocate without warning your media-relations person.”
Indeed, when I first inquired about an interview with Roberts before he started at The Insider, a spokesperson for the show instantly said no. When I followed up two months later, it was no dice again. Roberts says he doesn’t recall being contacted either time.
This January, though, he got involved directly, when I learned through a mutual contact that he was interested in talking. Yet when he ran the idea up the flagpole, he too was denied. Roberts won’t cite the reasons on the record, but he was clearly disappointed by the decision. When I asked him how he felt about it, there was a long pause while he considered his response. “I won’t attach a negative to it,” he finally says diplomatically, “but I will say that I was flattered by the offer and thought that it would be great to be included.” It wasn’t until this February, when his contract was unexpectedly optioned -- meaning he was cut from the show -- that he was free to talk.
Roberts doesn’t want to knock anyone. He’s not that kind of guy. “Quote me: I am flawed! I make mistakes! I do things that are stupid! Hopefully this interview won’t be one of them!” But he also knows he’s making a difference, as hackneyed as that sounds. “I heard this phrase the other night: You can always tell the pioneers by the number of arrows in their back,” he says, chuckling. “It’s not that I want to be a pioneer -- I’m certainly a reluctant role model -- but it’s like, Come out already. There’s just no reason not to.”
“I can state unequivocally that we would be a thousand percent supportive of any employee who wanted to come out publicly,” says ABC News senior vice president Jeffrey Schneider, who is gay. And yet, none of the highest-profile gays on the air at ABC News (think Good Morning America, which is reportedly called “GayMA” by its rivals at Today) wanted to come out for this story, since they declined to be interviewed. Nevertheless, Schneider says, being openly gay isn’t a career breaker: “Are people good broadcasters? Are they aggressive and great journalists? How do they do their job? Those are the things that people talk about in terms of the on-air talent.”
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.