
Secretly and without consultation with the U.S. Congress, the U.S. military has suspended, in part, its ban on openly gay soldiers, an official military spokesperson has said. But after these soldiers have risked life and limb for their country, the military retains the right to kick them out when they get home.
"The bottom line is, some people are using sexual orientation to avoid deployment. So in this case, with the Reserve and Guard forces, if a soldier 'tells,' they still have to go to war, and the homosexual issue is postponed until they return to the U.S. and the unit is demobilized," said Kim Waldron of the U.S. Army Forces Command at Fort McPherson, as quoted in a <i>Washington Blade</i> story published Friday.
Congress passed a ban on openly gay and lesbian service members in 1993. The law, signed by President Clinton, created the policy known as "don't ask, don't tell," allowing only closeted soldiers to remain in any military service. Any solider who admits being gay or lesbian must be discharged under the policy. No exception in that law was carved out for combat duty.
Nevertheless, in a 1999 Army manual called the "Reserve Component Unit Commander's Handbook," uncovered this month by the Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military in Santa Barbara, Calif., Army officers are instructed to retain openly gay soldiers during wartime. In the case of any possible discharge for homosexual conduct or admission requested "prior to the unit's receipt of alert notification," the handbook states, "discharge isn't authorized. Member will enter AD [active duty] with the unit."
That policy appears to be in clear violation of the law.
According to the Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military, statistics confirm that during the Iraq war discharges for homosexual conduct or acknowledgement, both outlawed in the military, have fallen. The military has long denied that any official policy existed that would ignore the legal obligations of "don't ask." Waldon's acknowledgement is the first such admission.
"The military has claimed for years that allowing openly gay and lesbian service members to serve in uniform would undermine unit cohesion," said Aaron Belkin, director of the California think tank. "During wartime, however, when cohesion is most important, the Pentagon retains gays and lesbians."
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.