Continental promo
||  News  ||
 
October 04, 2005

Catholic churches lead signature drive to ban same-sex marriage in Massachusetts

The campaign to end same-sex marriage in Massachusetts has found traction in the state's churches, with thousands of Catholics and other worshippers lending their signatures to a petition drive seeking to abolish same-sex unions in the state. With the backing of the state's four Roman Catholic bishops, opponents of marriage equality set up shop at more than 200 churches across this heavily Catholic state, and some Protestant churches have also joined in the effort.

"It just seems so strange for me to stand here today and preach what I think is so obvious: Marriage is between a man and a woman," said the Reverend Walter Waldron, pastor of St. Patrick Church in Boston's Roxbury neighborhood, who used his Sunday homily to rally support for the ballot initiative. "It's not just our faith," he said. "It's for the good of society."

Organizers said they had collected about 25,000 signatures since September 21, The Boston Globe reported Monday, including thousands gathered at churches over the weekend. They must collect more than 65,000 signatures before November 23 for the question to qualify for the 2008 ballot, but sponsors hope to gather double that number to protect against a challenge.

Supporters of same-sex marriage, led by the MassEquality advocacy group, gathered outside many churches on Sunday to protest the signature drive. "We completely respect people's right to worship," said Marc Solomon, the group's political director. "However, we are very concerned that the church hierarchy has made taking away marriage equality—and replacing it with nothing else—such a high priority."

Saying Mass Sunday at the Cathedral of the Holy Cross, Boston archbishop Sean O'Malley also urged parishioners to sign the petition. Massachusetts is the only state that allows gay and lesbian couples to marry following a 2003 ruling by the state's highest court. Vermont and Connecticut recognize civil unions.

Opponents have rallied around the ballot initiative after lawmakers last month defeated a proposed constitutional amendment that would have banned same-sex marriage but created civil unions. The proposed question would ban both, but the earliest it can go up for a statewide vote is November 2008. After collecting the signatures, supporters must then win the support of 50 lawmakers in two successive legislative sessions before it can go on the ballot.

At St. Thomas Aquinas Church in Boston's Jamaica Plain neighborhood, gay couples approached parishioners and urged them not to sign the petition. "I want them to see the face of someone who is married so they can see how benign and human we are," said Elizabeth Anker, 51, who married Aina Allen, her partner of 20 years, last year.

Wendy Loveland, 41, and her spouse, Margaret Williams, handed out copies of a letter they wrote explaining their support for same-sex marriage. Some parishioners appeared to be confused by why the protesters were there. "So where do I sign the petition?" one elderly woman asked Loveland.

"Oh, we're against that," Loveland responded.

"I won't even read the letter," the parishioner said. "I want to sign the petition."

At St. Patrick, more than half of the roughly 50 people who attended Waldron's Mass signed the petition. Earlier, at least 30 parishioners signed the petition following a Mass said in Cape Verdean. "I don't believe two men or two women should marry. That's not what God intended," said Connie Fidalgo, who collected signatures at a table outside the church.

Some St. Patrick parishioners said they wouldn't sign the petition. "It's 2005. Times have changed," said Ilduce Brandao, of Boston. "It's time to accept people for who they are." (AP)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.