
The Walgreens
drug store chain is the latest corporation to come
under fire by an Illinois Christian group for
sponsoring the 2006 Gay Games in Chicago, the
Chicago Tribune reported Wednesday.
The Illinois Family Institute is angry that
Walgreen Co. has made a $100,000 contribution to
the Games, which are set for July. The group wants the
company to take back its money—or face a boycott.
"The Gay Games are about homosexuality, and I
think it's wrong for Walgreens to sponsor it," Peter
LaBarbera, executive director of the Illinois Family
Institute, told the Tribune. "They've taken the
step of becoming an official sponsor, which is putting
the Walgreens name to endorsing this event." The institute
has also attacked Harris Bank and Kraft Foods for each
contributing $25,000 to the Games, according to the
newspaper. However, Walgreens officials are not budging.
Spokesman Michael Polzin told the Tribune
that the company is taking part in the Games to raise
awareness about HIV/AIDS. The company's pharmacists
have been serving HIV-positive patients since the
early 1980s. "Each year we raise millions of dollars
in our stores for research education and building awareness
for heart disease, diabetes, and cancer," he told the
newspaper. "This is one way of giving back to the community."
More than 10,000 athletes are expected to
compete in the Games before an estimated 100,000
spectators. Chicago Games Inc. has been scrambling to
raise the $9 million needed to hold the event, the newspaper
reported. Games officials say they are nearly halfway
to their goal of raising $1 million from corporate sponsors.
"They keep doing this, and corporate America
keeps coming," Tracy Baim, co–vice chair of
Chicago Games, told the newspaper. "When we meet with
[potential] sponsors, we are very up-front with being
targeted by the IFI. It brings a higher visibility to
the discrimination we face." (Chad Graham,
Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.