
In a win for gay
rights, a committee in the Virginia senate has narrowly
killed legislation barring gay adoptive parents in other
states from getting both of their names listed on
birth certificates issued by Virginia. The education
and health committee voted 8–7 to kill the
measure, which Sen. Emmett Hanger filed in response to a
ruling last April by the Virginia supreme court.
In that case, the court said the state
Department of Vital Records must provide new birth
certificates for children born in Virginia and adopted
by same-sex couples in other states. Three gay couples had
filed suit after the state refused to issue new
certificates for their adopted children.
Hanger's bill would have allowed only one
same-sex partner to be listed on a birth certificate.
Hanger said that is consistent with Virginia law
prohibiting joint adoptions by unmarried
couples—including same-sex couples.
"Wouldn't the other partner feel terribly
discriminated against?" asked Sen. H. Russell Potts
Jr., chairman of the committee. "Aren't you creating a
situation of recognizing one member of a family as being
important and one being a nonentity?"
Aimee Perron Seibert, lobbyist for the American
Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, told the committee
that listing only one adoptive parent's name on a
birth certificate could prevent the other parent from
obtaining school records or medical care for the child.
Dyana Mason, executive director of the gay
rights group Equality Virginia, also spoke against the
proposal. She said it would violate the Full Faith and
Credit Clause of the Constitution, which requires states
to honor rulings issued by courts in other states.
Potts, a Republican who made news during his
independent campaign for governor last year by
publicly supporting adoption by gays, joined all seven
Democrats on the committee in voting to kill the measure.
(AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.