Maryland judge strikes down same-sex marriage ban

Is full marriage equality on the horizon for gay and lesbian couples in Maryland? It came one step closer to reality on Friday when a circuit court judge declared a 33-year-old law banning same-sex marriage in that state unconstitutional.

Baltimore city circuit court judge Brooke Murdock sided with 19 gay men and women in their lawsuit seeking marriage rights. The suit was filed in 2004 with the American Civil Liberties Union and Equality Maryland. “When tradition is the guise under which prejudice or animosity hides, it is not a legitimate state interest,” Murdock wrote in her ruling. “The court is not unaware of the dramatic impact of its ruling, but it must not shy away from deciding significant legal issues when fairly presented to it for judicial determination.”

Murdock put a stay on her decision in order to allow the state time to appeal, which it already has, said Paul Cates, director of public education for the lesbian and gay rights project at the ACLU. Both Cates and Steven Palmer, one of the plaintiffs in the case, described this as a positive step.

“This is a good thing, because if there was no appeal, the plaintiffs in the case would be the only ones to get marriage licenses,” said Palmer, 34, who sued the state with his 32-year old partner, Ryan Killough. “Until the decision is appealed and the [1973] law is fully struck down, we won’t have marriage rights for all Marylanders.”

Palmer told Advocate.com that the impetus for his joining the suit was a growing awareness of the inequality of the situation. “Because my partner and I are both in health care—I’m a flight nurse, and Ryan is a paramedic—we see all the rights and legal protections people get through marriage, especially in terms of health care and coverage. Right now we don’t have any of that.”

Same-sex marriage would be legalized in Maryland if the state’s high court of appeals upholds Friday’s decision, but according to Cates, there’s a possible hitch. If the plaintiff’s case is directed to an intermediate appeals court, it would need to clear that court, in addition to the high court of appeals, to become law.

“We don’t know which court it will go to,” Cates said. “We’ll probably know in a few weeks or a month or so. It will probably be a year before we have a [final] decision.”

Cates added that the ACLU is prepared for a negative backlash from far-right groups and conservative lawmakers. "We think we can hold legislation from passing any sort of amendment that might disturb this ruling," he said.

Friday's victory came as Maryland's Republican governor, Robert Ehrlich, announced a plan that would allow domestic partners more power over medical decisions for their significant others.

It remains unclear whether the governor’s legislation will influence the marriage case. Some state Democrats were not happy, however, declaring Ehrlich’s move a political ploy because the legislation lacks many protections and comes on the heels of their successful attempt on Thursday to change state rules making it harder for Republicans to enact antigay laws.

"A bridal registry at Target would offer same-sex couples more benefits than this watered-down election-year ploy. It is simply an attempt to keep the Medical Decision Making Act from being sent to [Ehrlich's] desk again," said Eric Stern, executive director of National Stonewall Democrats. "While Governor Ehrlich plays politics in an effort to stop his plummeting poll numbers, we'll continue to work with Maryland Democrats on passing substantive legislation this session."

Maryland does not offer either civil or domestic partnerships to same-sex couples, and some gay rights groups hope that Friday's court ruling means they can skip those legal classifications and be allowed to legally marry. “If you want to give people the same rights and legal protections as heterosexual couples, keeping them separate with domestic partnerships doesn’t work,” Palmer said. "Separate is not equal, and it’s not acceptable.” (Neal Broverman, Advocate.com)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives

View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.

Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.

Hungry Like the Wolf
A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.

Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.

The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.

Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.

The Pride of Antwerp
Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.

Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.

Top Political Blogs
From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.

The Diva of French Television
A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.