
As local and national leaders plot its demise, same-sex marriage in Massachusetts—and the 8,100 gay and lesbian couples who so far have taken advantage of it—celebrated a sweet second anniversary on Wednesday.
Gay rights activists plan to celebrate the historic day by delivering flowers to state legislators in Boston who are planning a July 12 vote on a proposed initiative petition that could amend the state constitution to declare same-sex marriage illegal.
In light of the anniversary, many gays and lesbians have grown apathetic, according to some in the state.
"A lot of people...don't really understand, " said Patricia Griffin, a retired professor who married her wife in 2004, to the Boston Republican. "They think we have the right, that people are safe and nothing will happen. It could be taken away."
Nationally, the Federal Marriage Amendment—the push to amend the U.S. Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman—is expected to be brought up Thursday in the Senate Judiciary Committee. The measure is being pushed by Republican senators Bill Frist and Wayne Allard in a widely believed effort to mobilize their conservative base to get out to the polls for November's midterm elections.
“With gas prices hitting $3 a gallon, millions living without health care, a broken immigration system, and an endless war in Iraq, Congress should be helping make America stronger, not weaker, by trying to put discrimination in the United States Constitution,” said Human Rights Campaign president Joe Solmonese in a statement.
While states like Vermont and California offer civil unions and domestic partnerships for gay and lesbian couples, Massachusetts remains the only state with marriage equality.
Gay couples swarmed altars immediately after Massachusetts legalized same-sex marriage two years ago, but according to numbers from the Department of Public Health, the number of same-sex marriages dropped sharply from that time. The decision to legalize same-sex marriage in the Massachusetts came from a state supreme judicial court decision in November 2003 that stated it was unconstitutional to deny gay couples to right to marry, and the court stayed its ruling until May 17 of the following year. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.