
Chicago police may not be ready to label the December 31 shooting of a group of black men at a "gay house" party as a hate crime, but that doesn't mean the issue of antigay violence shouldn't become part of the discussion, said the chairman of the city's commission on human relations on Friday. In a press statement titled "Shooting of Six on South Side Is a Tragedy, Hate Crime or Not," Clarence Wood said he was appalled by the attack.
But even more appalling, he said, "is that some people interviewed by the media saw an attack on gay people as something that was bound to happen and was essentially only a matter of time." In a report by the Chicago Sun-Times, Wood noted that a man from the neighborhood was quoted as saying, "We always be seeing them, and they always be looking at people.... They give you that gay look, like you're a female or something. That ain't cute. People be ready to fight.... I knew something was going to happen to that house."
Six men were injured in the shooting, two of them seriously, when two masked gunmen forcibly entered a first-floor apartment and opened fire during the party early last Sunday. "They came in and started shooting. The motive is unknown, and we haven't determined if it is gang-related or not," police spokeswoman Monique Bond told the Chicago T ribune. "The difficulty is that the gunmen were masked."
"While the police have not yet determined the motive of the shooting, it is extremely disturbing that anyone could believe that the victims somehow deserved to be shot because they were gay or 'acted gay,' " Wood said in the statement. "Let's not take a step back in our thinking to a time when violence against gays and lesbians was acceptable behavior. I fear what group would become the next target if this kind of thinking becomes commonplace." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.