
Sara Wheeler's life has become a contradiction. Once a proud lesbian, she's now a pariah among gays. Once in a committed relationship with a female partner, she's rethinking her sexuality. And now she's doing something she once would have considered unthinkable: arguing that gays don't have the legal right to adopt children.
Wheeler is coming to grips with the fact that she's become an outcast for taking this step in a custody fight for her child. But she says that isn't what her fight is about: ''It's about motherly rights.''
Wheeler, 36, and her partner, Missy, decided to start a family together and share the Wheeler last name. In 2000, Sara gave birth to a son, Gavin, through artificial insemination. Two years later, they decided Missy should adopt the child and legally become his second parent.
Georgia law doesn't specifically say whether gay parents can adopt a child, so the decision was up to a judge in the Atlanta area's DeKalb County. After an adoption investigator determined that both partners were committed to the child, the judge cleared the request.
The couple's relationship later soured. Missy wouldn't comment for this story, but her attorney, Nora Bushfield, said Sara became involved with someone else and wouldn't let Missy and Gavin see each other.
Sara acknowledged the other relationship, saying ''regardless of my action, it doesn't make me a bad mother.''
Sara and Missy Wheeler had split by July 2004, and Missy was fighting for joint custody of the boy.
The two sides do agree about one thing: The case is about a mother's rights. ''Everybody seems to forget we're not talking about lesbian rights,'' Missy's attorney says. ''We're talking about a child who's been bonded with a mother.''
Sara made the legal argument that, since nothing in Georgia law specifically allowed adoption by gays, the adoption should be tossed out.
Her first lawyers warned her the case could set gay rights back a century. She hired a new attorney and asked the DeKalb County court to toss the adoption that she had previously pushed for, claiming it should never have been approved because it runs afoul of state law.
News of the tactic whipped up Atlanta's gay community, one of the largest in the South. Lambda Legal, a gay rights group, made a legal filing with the Georgia supreme court supporting Missy Wheeler. ''There's something about this case that's just tragic,'' said Greg Nevins, a lawyer for the group.
Laura Douglas-Brown, editor of Southern Voice, the city's main gay newspaper, penned a column accusing Sara Wheeler of ''self-hating.'' ''We owe it to each other not to lash out in ways that damage the entire gay community,'' she wrote. ''Your own family may be destroyed, but don't destroy ours too.''
Sara said she felt like she had no choice. ''I'm not doing anything else a mother wouldn't do to fight for her son,'' she said. ''Some people may think it's the unthinkable, but if they were put in my shoes, they'd do the same thing.''
It didn't go so well. Her lawsuit seeking to throw out the adoption was rejected by the DeKalb County judge and later by the state court of appeals.
Then the Georgia supreme court, in a 4–3 vote in February, declined to hear the case. Only months earlier the court had upheld the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, which Georgia voters overwhelmingly approved in 2004.
Justice George H. Carley, who voted with the minority in the adoption case, declared he was ''at a loss to comprehend'' why the court refused to consider a case of such ''great concern, gravity, and public importance.''
Sara Wheeler is asking the state supreme court to reconsider her case. Such a request rarely succeeds, but the narrow vote gives her hope that one justice might be swayed.
''There's nothing that states this is an acceptable adoption,'' she said. ''If Georgia wants to allow it, it needs to make proper laws.''
As the legal motions flew back and forth, the two women established a workable routine. The 7-year-old boy goes to Missy Wheeler's place every other weekend and on Tuesday nights. The rest of the time he stays with Sara Wheeler, who ferries him to karate practice, plays tag with him outside her apartment, and takes him out for pizza every Friday.
The case has taken a toll on Sara. Aside from a few gay friends, she has turned away from the gay community. She no longer dates and doesn't go to gay clubs or events anymore. She said she is rethinking whether she is still a lesbian and whether she should abandon dating for good.
''I just don't feel comfortable in that scene,'' she says. ''I'm just trying to figure it all out.''
She knows she's seen as a betrayer, but in a sense she feels she was the one betrayed. ''Before I'm anything, gay or lesbian, I'm a mother,'' she says. ''And the most important thing is to make sure my son has a relationship with his biological mother.'' (Greg Bluestein, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.