John Edwards appeared on The Tonight Show With Jay Leno last night with wife Elizabeth and, according to the Associated Press, said that he did not know she supports same-sex marriage. Indeed, the presidential candidate said, he was surprised to learn of her position when he read news reports of her remarks just before San Francisco’s pride parade on Sunday.
Really? The Edwards campaign deployed Elizabeth Edwards, arguably as much a star now as John himself, to one of the premier gay events of the year, and the two did not discuss, let alone strategize about, what she would say there?
Just after kicking off his campaign, John Edwards discussed same-sex marriage in a joint appearance with his wife on December 31 on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Edwards acknowledged that marriage equality is “the single hardest” issue for him because of his small-town upbringing and that he backs civil unions as a path to providing rights to gay couples.
When Stephanopoulos asked Elizabeth Edwards whether she favors same-sex marriage, she responded, “Well, it's not particularly important whether I am, but I guess I come from a more eclectic background and so it’s less problematic, I think, probably for me.”
This Week then ran a clip of John Edwards stumping in New Hampshire: “My daughter who is 24 and goes to school in Cambridge—her generation and all of her friends believe this issue will completely disappear with their generation.”
Elizabeth Edwards, with John seated next to her, reflected on the views of her daughter: “And I have to say she’s talked to children on both sides of the aisle who are her age—the children of our senators and politicians on both sides of the aisle—and people who are her age, regardless of the political affiliation of their parents, all believe exactly the same thing. This issue will not exist when they are the people who are sitting in these seats.”
Does this sound like a family that doesn’t discuss the issue of gay rights and, more specifically, same-sex marriage?
This is not the first issue on which Edwards’s sincerity could be legitimately called into question. His “Two Americas” campaign is beginning to reveal two Edwards: one who seems genuinely impassioned about the plight of poor Americans yet builds a multimillion-dollar mansion and gets famously expensive haircuts. He’s the candidate who won awards ranging from $6 to $60 million as a trial lawyer filing cases against doctors and hospitals. Yet he is concerned about the vast number of Americans who lack health care insurance because they can’t afford sky-high rates and was the first Democratic presidential candidate to offer a detailed plan for universal health care.
As one prominent blogger recently noted at an Edwards event, he’s the one candidate who seems to have lost control of his public image. This is ironic, since Edwards has also made a point of doing away with all those fancy consultants who he believes stifled the candidacy of John Kerry by turning him into Mr. Bland (not that he was Mr. Charisma to begin with).
Later in the This Week interview, Edwards said of his wife, “She is my most trusted adviser and always has been, always will be, and I care what she says about things. We disagree, you know.”
Stephanopoulos challenged Edwards to name “one issue” on which they disagreed.
“Not on camera, I’m not going there,” responded Edwards. “But we know what they are and she is a strong-willed woman.” Apparently, John Edwards did not know same-sex marriage was an issue they differed on even though, thankfully, Elizabeth Edwards is not shy about speaking her mind. (Kerry Eleveld, The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.
Home | Contact | Current Issue | LGBT Community Partners | Staff
Advertise With Us | Jobs | Help
Subscribe: Print Edition Digital Edition | Subscriber Services: Print Edition Digital Edition
Visit our Websites
Out.com | OutTraveler.com | HIVPlusMag.com | Alyson.com | Gay.com | PlanetOut.com
Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Community Guidelines | Legal Notice
Advocate.com © 2008 PlanetOut Inc. All Rights Reserved.
