
It was not Judge Lance Ito -- famous for presiding over the 1995 double murder trial of O.J. Simpson -- who declared Simpson “guilty as sin” of current charges leveled against him to gossip site TMZ.com’s cameras. Actually it was The Advocate’s own accounts payable supervisor, Jeff Lee, in attendance at the magazine’s 40th anniversary party.
Lee was standing outside the West Hollywood, Calif., restaurant and lounge Republic Tuesday night, where cameras loomed just feet away to capture celebrities as they left the venue. As he and his guest waited for gift bags, camera operators asked his verdict on Simpson's being charged with armed robbery, among other crimes, at a Las Vegas hotel last week.
“At first I thought they just wanted to take photos of celebrities,” Lee said Wednesday. “Then after a while, I thought they were interested in getting an opinion poll. But then I heard one mention ‘Judge Ito’ and it just clicked in.”
Lee said he decided to play along. With the cameras rolling, he gave his verdict and took to the street.
Wednesday morning a coworker told him he had been mistakenly identified as Ito on a just-posted TMZ.com video. The post was soon taken down after the Los Angeles County superior court made the error known.
"The video does not depict Judge Ito," the court said in a statement. "He is not in the video, and he did not, and has not, commented in any way to TMZ.com -- or any other media organization -- about the Las Vegas case or any other matter relating to O.J. Simpson -- past or present."
Lee himself e-mailed the site, saying that the incident gave him a good laugh. He said that aside from an auto-response e-mail, TMZ did not get back to him. The video has been reinstated, however, identifying Lee as an Ito look-alike. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.