Suit by Homophobic High Schooler Given Go-ahead  | News | Advocate.com

||  News  ||
 
10/27/07-10/29/07
Suit by Homophobic High Schooler Given Go-ahead

A high school student can pursue nominal damages from an eastern Kentucky school district over its required antiharassment training, an appeals court ruled Friday.

The U.S. sixth circuit court of appeals ruled 2–1 that the Boyd County school district’s policy imposed a "chill" on student Timothy Allen Morrison’s ability to profess his Christian beliefs and opposition to homosexuality. The ruling sends the case back to U.S. district judge David Bunning for a hearing on damages. Judge Karen Nelson Moore, joined by Judge John R. Adams, wrote that the allegation of a policy stifling free speech is enough to allow Morrison to seek damages. To make his case, the judges said, Morrison must show that the policy would "deter a person of ordinary firmness" from exercising free speech rights.

Messages left for the Alliance Defense Fund, the Scottsdale, Ariz.–based Christian legal group that represented Morrison, as well as the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented the school district, were not immediately returned. Morrison sued the school district, claiming that the mandatory antiharassment training threatened him with punishment for expressing religious beliefs in opposition to homosexuality. Morrison is a professed Christian who believes his religion requires him to speak out against what he sees as behavior that doesn’t comport with his understanding of Christian morality.

The policy was later changed to allow students to opt out of the training and exempt speech that would normally be protected off campus. In the dissent, Judge Deborah Cook said Morrison chose not to speak out against homosexuality and thus didn’t risk being punished. Cook said that Morrison suffered no actual harm from the policy and that holding a trial for damages to award "a single dollar" serves no purpose and "trivializes" the business of the federal courts in protecting the Constitution.

"We cannot find a school district constitutionally liable for chilling student speech every time a student chooses caution over risking possible discipline," she wrote.

The training sessions were part of a settlement in 2004 of a three-year dispute between the school district and a now-defunct gay rights group that wanted recognition as an extracurricular group. At issue was the federal Equal Access Act, which says districts can’t bar student groups from access to school facilities based on religious, political, or philosophical orientation if the districts let other groups meet on campus. (Brett Barrouquere, AP)

© 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

Error:Server capacity reached.
Error:Server capacity reached.
Error:Server capacity reached. Subscribe to the digital edition. Subscribe to the print edition.
Error:Server capacity reached.