
The U.S. Senate Ethics Committee says Idaho senator Larry Craig acted improperly in connection with a men's room sex sting last year and had brought discredit on the Senate.
In a letter to the Republican senator, the ethics panel said Craig's attempt to withdraw his guilty plea after his arrest at an airport in Minnesota was an effort to evade legal consequences of his actions.
Craig's actions constitute ''improper conduct which has reflected discreditably on the Senate,'' the letter said.
In an e-mailed statement, Craig told the Associated Press he disagreed with the ethics panel's action.
''While I am disappointed and strongly disagree with the conclusions reached by the Senate Ethics Committee, from the outset I have encouraged the committee to act in a timely fashion, and they have done so. I will continue to serve the people of Idaho,'' he said.
The six members of the committee -- three Democrats, three Republicans -- told Craig they believed he ''committed the offense to which you pled guilty'' and that ''you entered your plea knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.''
The panel said Craig tried to remove his guilty plea only after his attempts to avoid public disclosure had failed.
''Your claims to the court ... to the effect that your guilty plea resulted from improper pressure or coercion, or that you did not, as a legal matter, know what you were doing when you pled guilty do not appear credible,'' the letter said.
The panel also said Craig should have received permission from the ethics panel before using campaign money to pay his legal bills. Craig, who is not running for reelection, has spent more than $213,000 in campaign money for legal expense and public relations work in the aftermath of his arrest and conviction last summer.
The committee said it had reached no conclusion about whether use of campaign funds was proper, but it said ''it is clear that you never sought the committee's approval, as required,'' to use the money for legal expenses.
Any future use of campaign money for legal bills will be seen as ''demonstrating your continuing disregard of ethics requirements,'' the ethics committee wrote in its three-page letter.
The panel also admonished Craig for showing the arresting officer a business card that identified him as a U.S. senator. Craig has been reported to have told the officer at the time, ''What do you think about that?''
The committee wrote, ''You knew or should have known that a reasonable person in the position of the arresting officer could view your action and statement as an improper attempt by you to use your position and status ... to receive special and favorable treatment.''
Democratic senator Barbara Boxer, chairwoman of the ethics panel, would not comment. A spokeswoman said the panel's letter of admonition cannot be appealed.
The ethics panel took no further action against Craig.
Craig, a three-term Republican, pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in August after he was accused of soliciting sex in a bathroom at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport in June.
After the matter became public, Craig tried to withdraw his plea. A judge in Minnesota refused, saying Craig's plea ''was accurate, voluntary, and intelligent, and ... supported by the evidence.'' Craig has appealed that ruling to the Minnesota court of appeals.
Senate Republicans demanded the ethics investigation after news broke of Craig's conviction last August. Craig first promised to resign September 30, then reversed his decision. He now says he will stay in office until his term expires in January.
Craig has said an undercover police officer misinterpreted his foot and hand movements as signals that he wanted sex.
Craig, who lost several Republican leadership positions on Senate committees and subcommittees after the scandal, has been working with Boxer and other members of the Senate's environment committee on a global warming bill and other matters.
Besides Boxer, the letter is signed by Republican senator John Cornyn, the panel's vice chairman, and Democratic senators Mark Pryor and Ken Salazar and Republican senators Pat Roberts and Johnny Isakson. (Matthew Daly, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.