A senior Senate Democrat said Tuesday that he wants to use a major defense policy bill to expand federal hate-crimes laws to protect gays, bring troops home from Iraq, and force Baghdad to pay more toward reconstruction costs.
The effort would raise the flag on major issues favored by the party's base. But only the reconstruction provision is considered to have a chance at passing -- and even that proposal's prospects would depend heavily on Republican cooperation.
Slim margins in Congress, particularly in the Senate, where 60 votes are needed to overcome procedural hurdles, have kept Democrats from enacting much of their legislative agenda since taking control last year.
Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, suggested Democrats will try anyway, starting with the measure that would prohibit U.S. money from being spent on reconstruction and possibly other war-related costs. Levin, who plans to meet this week with Defense secretary Robert Gates on the issue, says Iraq should use its massive oil profits to cover rebuilding efforts.
GOP lawmakers have signaled a willingness to back such a measure, depending on how it is written. Republican senators Susan Collins of Maine, Bob Corker of Tennessee, and Judd Gregg of New Hampshire have proposed separate measures that call for Iraq or its neighbors to pay more for reconstruction.
Levin's measure would be proposed as part of the 2009 defense authorization bill, policy legislation that guides defense spending and the acquisition and management of all military programs.
The Democratic chairman also said he hopes a broader hate-crimes law becomes part of the debate. Last year Democrats tried to attach a similar measure to the defense authorization bill but backed down after Republican protests threatened to sink the bill.
''Diversity and tolerance and hate crimes runs smack against what the men and women of the American armed forces fight for,'' Levin told reporters Tuesday.
In addition, Democrats are expected to revive legislation that would force President Bush to withdraw troops from Iraq by a certain date. Levin said this proposal could be offered on the defense authorization bill or earlier, when the Senate considers a separate war spending bill.
Democrats have repeatedly failed to pass such legislation in the past, falling short of the 60 votes needed in the Senate.
The committee plans to complete the defense authorization bill by the end of next week, with a floor vote expected by the end of May. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.
Home | Contact | Current Issue | LGBT Community Partners | Staff
Advertise With Us | Jobs | Help
Subscribe: Print Edition Digital Edition | Subscriber Services: Print Edition Digital Edition
Visit our Websites
Out.com | OutTraveler.com | HIVPlusMag.com | Alyson.com | Gay.com | PlanetOut.com
Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Community Guidelines | Legal Notice
Advocate.com © 2008 PlanetOut Inc. All Rights Reserved.