
The United States's first openly gay governor tried to convince the judge in his divorce case Wednesday that he's too poor to pay alimony, saying he's been financially crippled by his resignation and marital troubles.
Former New Jersey governor James McGreevey said he has limited income and few assets and is all but unemployable these days.
''I got my furnishings at a Huffman Koos going-out-of-business sale,'' McGreevey said when asked to describe his belongings.
He and his wife, Dina Matos McGreevey, have been separated since he left office in November 2004, three months after he said he had an affair with a male staffer and planned to resign. The staffer denies he had an affair with McGreevey and accused him of sexual harassment.
The couple have agreed on custody of their only child, 6-year-old Jacqueline, but are fighting over alimony, child support, and how to divide their assets and liabilities.
Matos McGreevey is asking the court to award her alimony and additional money based on the contention that McGreevey committed marriage fraud. She says she was duped into marriage by a gay man who needed the cover of a wife to advance his political career.
McGreevey counters that his wife, whom he married in 2000, should have known he was gay and that for most of their marriage, she made more money than him.
He spent hours on the stand Wednesday detailing his jobs and sources of income.
''Because of this case, I have been financially crippled,'' he said.
He was expected to return to the stand Thursday morning.
Now an Episcopal seminary student, McGreevey, 50, said he owes a prior divorce lawyer at least $116,000 and has not paid his first ex-wife any child support this year. He said he relies on his boyfriend to pay legal bills and other expenses.
McGreevey said he is indifferent to money and passed up opportunities to increase his income during his marriage by instead running for public office.
Before he took the stand, McGreevey lawyer Stephen Haller told the judge the ex-governor should not have to pay alimony to his wife because the couple's ''short-term marriage'' does not qualify for her for it. Haller accused Matos McGreevey, 41, of having an ''emotional vendetta'' against his client.
Haller also said Dina Matos McGreevey's earnings exceeded her husband's during about half of their marriage.
John Post, who represents Dina Matos McGreevey, said it was ''absurd'' that the two partners had equal earnings, and said McGreevey is underestimating his earning potential.
Post noted that that McGreevey earned $429,000 in 2006 and $185,000 last year.
During his testimony, McGreevey said he proposed writing a tell-all book with his estranged wife, but she turned him down and later wrote her own memoir.
McGreevey said he was initially offered $1 million to write his life story shortly after leaving office in disgrace, but later signed a book contract for far less. He said his goal was not to make money, but to help gay and lesbian teenagers who might find the courage to live openly after reading about his life as a closeted gay man.
''It was about my failures, my sins,'' McGreevey said of his book, The Confession. (Angela Delli Santi, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.