
The Oregon court of appeals rejected arguments to overturn a 2004 ballot measure that amended the state's constitution to exclude gays and lesbians from marriage.
Basic Rights Oregon executive director Jeana Frazzini said in a press release Wednesday that Constitutional Amendment 36 reneges on the promise of equal protection for Oregonians. "Using the initiative process to treat one group of citizens differently insults the spirit of the Oregon constitution and violates every Oregon tradition of fairness," Frazzini said.
The plaintiffs argued in Martinez v. Kulongoski that the measure revised Oregon's constitution rather than adding an amendment. The rules for revising the constitution require a measure's supporters to present the measure to the legislature, rather than circulating initiative petitions, to put the question before Oregon voters, according to Basic Rights Oregon.
Lead attorney Mark Johnson said that the plaintiffs plan to appeal the case to the state supreme court because "the measure should never have been presented to Oregon voters." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.