New questions raised about Melania Trump's lucrative Log Cabin speech

New questions are being raised about the $237,500 fee former First Lady Melania Trump was paid for speaking at a Log Cabin Republicans event.

It was initially reported that the payment came from the Palm Beach Chapter of Log Cabin Republicans. She spoke at an April 20 event at the Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, where she and her husband, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, claim full-time residency.

But now “it’s a mystery who actually cut the check,” CNN reports. Charles Moran, president of the national Log Cabin Republicans, told CNN that the group did not fund the payment, and Donald Trump’s latest financial disclosure form offers no additional information.

It’s unclear whether Melania Trump was paid for speaking at another Log Cabin event, held in July, but there was at least one request to a donor, according to CNN. A source told the network that Richard Grenell, a gay man who was ambassador to Germany in Donald Trump’s administration, was the one making the request. Grenell did not respond to several CNN requests for comment, and Melania Trump’s spokesperson comment.

The former first lady was also paid $250,000 for a Log Cabin event in December 2022, and she received two other payments of at least that amount for speaking to groups that month, according to earlier financial disclosure forms viewed by CNN. One of the groups, Fix California, was founded by Grenell. These events took place just after Donald Trump announced he was running for the presidency again.

Trending stories

How climate disasters hurt mental health in young people

From rock legends to Pride flags: Discover the vibrant LGBTQ+ scene in Asbury Park

Discover why chic Costa Navarino is Europe's luxury getaway

All 6 rogue Mississippi cops got long prison sentences in 'Goon Squad' torture of 2 Black men

Where to stay in LGBTQ+ Ireland: Castles, domes and luxury retreats

​6 lesbian films coming we can't wait to see in 2025

Watch: In gay period romance 'Lilies Not For Me,' playful wrestling turns sensual (exclusive)

In 'Survival of the Thickest,' queer joy and activism are one and the same

Season 4 of The Switch on resilience & radical self-love returns this spring

Alan Cumming jumps for joy after major 'Avengers: Doomsday' casting news

Matt Bomer, as a 'Mid-Century Modern' ditz, can finally 'experience queer joy'

Bob the Drag Queen shades Mistress Isabelle Brooks’ weight loss: 'Girl, you have to get new pads'

In 'Mid-Century Modern,' the 'gay Avengers' assemble for needed comic relief

JD Vance ruthlessly mocked after everyone in Greenland refused to welcome wife Usha Vance

France becomes world’s first country to enshrine abortion rights in constitution

Joe Biden has tied the record for most LGBTQ+ judges confirmed in federal courts

Cowboys & Queens U.S. tour by Jane Hilton: A modern American dream

Trump's orders prompt CDC to erase HIV resources

Discover the power of Wellness in your life

SFAF's Dr. Tyler TerMeer says he'll continue to fight for health care for all

Gerald Garth is keeping people of color happy and healthy through trying times

'Mid-Century Modern': Celebrate Linda Lavin's most iconic roles

Elon Musk uses burner accounts on X, doesn’t fact-check: report

Nathan Lee Graham wants 'Mid-Century Modern's queer viewers to 'lean into the joy'

The Charles is Pacific Grove's new LGBTQ+ hotel

• 0
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8

The events were fundraisers for the groups involved and not for Donald Trump’s campaign. Still, “campaign finance and government ethics experts say a payment to a presidential candidate’s spouse to appear at political fundraisers in an election is unusual, ethically questionable and should, at the very least, be properly noted in the disclosure forms,” CNN reports.

“It seems pretty self-serving. From my own general observation, I’m not used to seeing that,” Virginia Canter, chief ethics counsel at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, told the network.

“You could indicate that payment was for a speaking engagement for the Log Cabin Republicans, but you also need to report who the source of the payment was, otherwise you can’t assess for the conflicts of interest, and it wouldn’t be in compliance with the rules,” she added. “It should have properly been reported so that the source of the income is listed for the honorarium.”