Impeachment Coverage Dragged for Demanding 'Pizzazz'

\u201cAnalysis: The first two witnesses called Wednesday testified to President Trump's scheme, but lacked the pizzazz necessary to capture public attention. https://t.co/1UfkaeZ3I4\u201d

— NBC News (@NBC News) 1573704784

\u201cMaybe it\u2019s more important for the American people to learn the facts than to have an analysis of pizazz. That\u2019s the purpose of public hearings and we\u2019d be a lot better off if it was the basis for our politics.\u201d

— Ben Rhodes (@Ben Rhodes) 1573707710

\u201cMedia: This is a dark and somber time for our country. Impeachment is nothing to celebrate.\n\nAlso the media: \u2018The hearings lacked the pizazz and drama we were hoping for!\u2019\u201d

— Dana Goldberg (@Dana Goldberg) 1573714250

\u201cAll day I thought to myself, will there be pizazz in the impeachment hearings? WILL THERE? Our kids will ask us, on the morning of the hearings, do you remember where you were when you realized there was no pizazz?\u201d

— Esther C, MD MPH (@Esther C, MD MPH) 1573706817

\u201cNuremberg trials should have had more pizazz.\u201d

— Dana Houle (@Dana Houle) 1573707898

\u201c@NBCNews \u201cLACKED THE PIZAZZ?? \n\nIs NBC kidding with that line? This isn\u2019t Miss Universe or a teenage beauty pageant, this is about upholding the nation\u2019s constitution and keeping together a democracy. \n\nWe\u2019re not looking for pizzazz, we\u2019re looking for TRUTH.\n\nMy God NBC. Act responsibly.\u201d

— NBC News (@NBC News) 1573704784

\u201cHi, @NBCNews \n\nYou know what story had plenty of \u201cpizazz\u201d?\n\nThe one you spiked about Matt Lauer.\u201d

— The Hoarse Whisperer (@The Hoarse Whisperer) 1573741124