CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Backers of a proposed constitutional amendment denying legal status to unmarried couples say it's needed to protect Ohio's two-month-old gay marriage ban from a court challenge. But lawyers, including the state representative who wrote that law, say the amendment is so unclear that it will lead to years of court battles if it is written into the Ohio constitution. Members of the Ohio Campaign to Protect Marriage submitted 391,794 signatures on Tuesday to Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell's office. They'll need almost 323,000 certified to get the measure on the November ballot. Ohio's proposed amendment would define marriage as a union between a man and a woman. It also would prohibit extending any legal status to unmarried couples "that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effect of marriage." The language would lead to "years, if not decades, of litigation" to determine the effect on such arrangements as two-person adoptions approved in another state, said Kent Markus, associate law professor at Capital University. "All of the problems arise in the last phrase," said Rep. Bill Seitz, a Cincinnati Republican and attorney. He wrote the state's gay marriage law so it would apply only to rights already in law, such as not testifying against a spouse in court. Words such as "intent" and "approximate" are by definition vague, he said, and courts would have to decide on "design, qualities, significance, or effect." "When I go in a ballot box will I vote yes on it? Probably, because I appreciate what they're trying to do," Seitz said. "As a lawyer, I would not put my own stamp of approval on it." Of the 13 states in which voters in the coming months will decide whether to amend their state constitutions to ban same-sex marriage, three of them address only the "one man, one woman" definition of marriage. "That's a waste of time if you are just going to protect the name and you don't care about the benefits," said Phil Burress, president of Cincinnati-based Citizens for Community Values and leader of the petition drive. Burress said the amendment is needed on top of the law because the highest court in Massachusetts allowed gay marriage and he doesn't trust the Ohio supreme court to rule differently. But he acknowledged those justices would have to interpret the amendment. "There's no way to avoid the courts," he said. "More important is whether it's going to get on the ballot." Burress said he hoped courts would rule that the amendment means the end of health insurance that some public universities, the city of Columbus, and many private employers have extended to employees' same-sex partners. The amendment doesn't specifically mention public universities or their private employment contracts, but they still could be considered part of state government, said John F. Burns, director of legal affairs at Ohio University, which offers the benefits. Alan Melamed, manager of the campaign opposing the amendment, said the proposal would affect couples such as senior citizens who live together but don't marry because they would lose pension benefits from a deceased spouse. He said it also could affect employment benefits offered by many corporations, which would hurt employee recruiting. "They can create a benefit; they just can't enforce it," Melamed said. Amendment supporters who helped sort and box petitions at a Columbus church said they hoped for a broad effect because people should not live together out of wedlock. The Reverend Kazava Smith, pastor of Corinthian Baptist Church in Cincinnati, said approving civil unions is a "slippery slope."
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
31 Period Films of Lesbians and Bi Women in Love That Will Take You Back
December 09 2024 1:00 PM
18 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
October 30 2024 11:06 AM
True
After 20 years, and after tonight, Obama will no longer be the Democrats' top star
August 20 2024 12:28 PM
Trump ally Laura Loomer goes after Lindsey Graham: ‘We all know you’re gay’
September 13 2024 2:28 PM
Melania Trump cashed six-figure check to speak to gay Republicans at Mar-a-Lago
August 16 2024 5:57 PM
Latest Stories
Ohio Lt. Gov. Jon Husted to replace JD Vance in the U.S. Senate
January 17 2025 5:21 PM
Boxers NYC Bartenders Calendar: Buff boys bulging for a cause
January 17 2025 2:30 PM
Kara Swisher calls Mark Zuckerberg a 'small little creature with a shriveled soul'
January 17 2025 3:31 AM
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis appoints Ashley Moody as Marco Rubio's replacement in the Senate
January 16 2025 6:17 PM
Durk Dehner steps down from Tom of Finland Foundation after Nazi controversy
January 16 2025 4:48 PM
Queer TikTok creators remain hopeful despite Supreme Court’s ruling upholding TikTok ban
January 17 2025 5:05 PM
Joe Biden declares that Equal Rights Amendment is ‘law of the land’ in new announcement
January 17 2025 2:05 PM
Health and Human Services takes stand against nonconsensual intersex surgeries
January 16 2025 7:59 PM
EDM revolution: Anyma's residency at Sphere in Vegas
January 16 2025 6:00 PM
Megyn Kelly rants about 'obese' lesbians when talking about L.A. fires
January 16 2025 3:35 PM
Gay Congresswoman Becca Balint: I'll show Trump I'm not intimidated
January 17 2025 7:34 PM
The anti-LGBTQ+ clergy who'll be praying at Donald Trump's inauguration
January 17 2025 6:55 PM
Will TikTok go dark? Will Trump enforce the ban? Here's what to know
January 17 2025 3:18 PM
Panic at the disco: A new novel examines the queer mid-life crisis in a uniquely beautiful way
January 17 2025 1:29 PM
Supreme Court upholds ban on TikTok, ruling against a freedom of speech argument
January 17 2025 10:34 AM
Arienne Childrey on becoming Ohio's first trans city council member
January 17 2025 6:00 AM
Full list of performers at Trump's 2025 inauguration
January 16 2025 6:57 PM