On a recent
Sunday night of television, on Fox, Homer Simpson became a
minister and married a long line of same-sex couples, and
his sister-in-law Patty came out. Over at ABC,
Desperate Housewives ended an episode with
Andrew Van De Kamp (Shawn Pyfrom) making out in a
swimming pool with a high school buddy (played by Eating
Out star Ryan Carnes). On Showtime a new season of
the lesbian series The L Word was in full swing.
All that, and no concerted protests from the
country's conservative activists. Such
moments--when U.S. media consumers experience a
collective yawn regarding gay and lesbian story
lines--give the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against
Defamation reason to celebrate and to note how far the
group has come in its 20-year history.
Its mission remains the same: to ensure that
gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender Americans are
portrayed accurately and fairly in the media, and its
work is far from over. In fact, the past year has had GLAAD
operating in high gear. As same-sex marriages were being
performed from San Francisco to New Paltz, N.Y., the
group was training couples on how to speak to the
media. It ripped into the advertising department of the
Los Angeles Times for publishing a recruitment ad
for the "ex-gay" group Exodus
International. And among other battles, it took on the
antigay lyrics of dancehall rapper Beenie Man, and the
Concerned Women for America for its statements on the
"pro-gay" agenda of the movie Kinsey.
"I think we are in the midst of one of
the most visible, loudest public arguments about our
lives and our love that we have ever been in,"
says Joan Garry, GLAAD's executive director since
1997. "I think that in this climate our
visibility can't be taken for granted."
Yet this is the moment Garry is stepping down as
GLAAD's guiding force. It's time, she
says, to spend more time with her Montclair, N.J.,
family: partner Eileen Opatut, their 15-year-old daughter,
and their 10-year-old twins, a boy and a girl.
"I think it's important for people to
hear from me that this is not Joan throwing up her
hands saying, 'I have had it. I am burnt to a
crisp,' " adds Garry, who leaves her post
in June. "My oldest daughter is three years
away from college, and my twins will soon be
teenagers, and we certainly are learning that spending more
time with your teenagers--whether they like it or
not--is really important."
As Garry departs, GLAAD is at a crossroads. On
one hand, it is on track to raise a robust $7.3
million in donations in 2005. It is considered a major
force in Hollywood. It can afford to send a staffer to a
local hot spot--for example, to New Mexico when
a county clerk began issuing marriage licenses to
same-sex couples in 2004--to meet with local
journalists. Garry and other GLAAD spokespeople are regulars
on even right-wing talk shows. And the group boasts a
membership of 15,000, many of them ready to take
action--write letters, cancel subscriptions,
attend a rally--at the drop of one of GLAAD's
tough-talking "media alerts."
Yet GLAAD is also working overtime to catch up
to a new era in the media: network news with partisan
spin, bloggers breaking hard news, the Federal
Communications Commission threatening $500,000 fines for
violations of ambiguous "indecency"
rules, the growing influence of the Christian right in
local media markets--to name just a few current
challenges. And its financial success and organizational
size--it has 46 full-time employees in New York
and Los Angeles--has fueled some dissatisfaction
with both the amount of energy spent on fund-raising
and a rigid management structure.
"GLAAD is like any other nonprofit
organization, where some people are going to be happy
and other people are going to have challenges,"
says Monica Taher, people of color media
director. "The culture of GLAAD is that we are
changing people's hearts and minds and that we
are doing a heck of a job."
Others charge that the group's luster has
dulled in recent years, that it has become better at
promoting itself than actually battling media that are
increasingly skittish about gay issues--distracted
perhaps by the celebrity power of its chief fund-raising
events, the three annual GLAAD Media Awards. The Los
Angeles event, set for April 30, is perhaps the most
star-studded, held at the Kodak Theatre in Hollywood,
home of the Academy Awards. All three 2005 shows are being
videotaped for broadcast on Logo, Viacom's
projected gay and lesbian cable channel, where
Garry's partner, Opatut, is senior vice president
for original programming.
Former
communications director Steve Spurgeon says GLAAD's
responsiveness to negative media images has dulled in recent
years. "GLAAD has to be much more laser-sharp
in its definition of what's acceptable and not
acceptable," says Spurgeon, who left his job in
2002 and has stopped donating money to GLAAD's
efforts. "It cannot be afraid to be an activist
organization. There's a lot of ground to be
gained in regard to this current administration."
Any discussion with knowledgeable insiders about
GLAAD's current state soon becomes an
assessment of Garry's strengths--a sign
both of her direct involvement in the group's many
efforts and of the herculean task the GLAAD board of
directors faces in finding a worthy successor. (A
nationwide search was ongoing at press time.)
"I'm concerned," says Hollywood
producer Lee Rose, who has collaborated with the group
on her projects. "Who the hell do you find to
follow that? The job is a lot of work and a lot of
traveling, and I understand why one has to pay
attention to the family and all of that, but I worry
that it's going to be such a tremendous loss for GLAAD."
Rose and others are quick to note that Garry has
secured the future of GLAAD for years to come. They
describe the former Showtime network executive as an
organizational wizard who inherited a fledgling
grassroots group with an anemic budget and turned it into a
visible and respected organization with nationwide
support and significant media clout. "Joan is
truly one of the great motivators, great speakers, and
also very on point and clear about what the message of GLAAD
is," Rose says.
Adds Taher: "I can tell you this: We
would not have a people of color media program and we
would not be doing the work that we do if it
wasn't for Joan's vision and desire to go the
extra mile."
Jasmyne Cannick, an African-American GLBT rights
activist, strongly disagrees. Cannick was the first
person to be in charge of GLAAD's outreach to
minority media outlets but left after just five months.
"GLAAD was the one organization that I thought I
could have really excelled in because their mission
was exactly the same as my mission. However, the
culture was very stuffy, very closed-doors, and very
secretive," she says. "I think that
GLAAD's mission is a wonderful mission, but I
don't think that the management team that they
have in place lives up to the mission."
Romaine Patterson, now a talk show host on
Sirius OutQ satellite radio, took a job as a GLAAD
regional media manager in 2000. "I was really
brought in not for my skills as an activist but more to kind
of be the face of Matthew Shepard for GLAAD,"
says Patterson, who was friends with the slain Wyoming
college student. "When it was time for grant
writing and proposals and trying to get extra money, my name
was often written into those. Most of that was done
without my knowing. I was furious."
Patterson, who left GLAAD in 2002, has mixed
feelings about her time there. "I really
enjoyed the company in which I worked," she
says. "Joan Garry is a great person. But there are
definitely challenges to working at GLAAD. I really
wanted to get the issues facing gay youth into the
line of thinking of GLAAD. I was shut down with that
time and time again with the line that 'Yeah,
we'd love to help gay youth, but gay youth
aren't going to give us money to pay the bills.' "
For other former employees, the distance the
group traveled under Garry is evidence enough of her
success as a leader. Cathy Renna, a 14-year veteran of
GLAAD who stepped down as its news media director in 2004,
remembers the group's lean days before Garry:
"We literally stood out in front of Lambda
Rising [a Washington, D.C., gay bookstore] and asked
people for a dollar, and that's how we paid the rent
and the phone bill. Grassroots? It was like seeds."
GLAAD was founded in 1985 in New York City by
several gay activists who were enraged at how the
New York Post covered gay subjects.
"They were issuing these incredibly defamatory,
homophobic, and AIDS-phobic articles," says
longtime GLAAD member Jeffrey Sosnick. "It was
inaccurate. It was sensationalist."
That campaign made waves in the local and gay
media, but GLAAD really registered on the national
radar in 1988 when the late Bob Hope appeared on
The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson. The
aging comedian enraged lesbian and gay activists when
he took a look at Ed McMahon's tie and said he
would have deemed the sidekick a "fag"
10 years earlier.
GLAAD's leaders sent Hope a letter
expressing their displeasure, and in a stunning
development the comedian agreed to shoot a public
service announcement denouncing violence against gays.
"It was pretty extraordinary. We can't
even get progressive artists to do that," Karin
Schwartz, then a GLAAD official, told reporters at the time.
Media outlets again took notice as GLAAD
protested the killer lesbian portrayals in Basic
Instinct during the movie's 1991 filming,
the desexing of lesbian characters in Fried Green
Tomatoes (released that same year), and the deletion of
a male-male kiss from the season finale of Melrose
Place in 1994. That fall GLAAD reorganized itself,
evolving from a network of local chapters into a
centralized national organization with a single board of
directors and a staff concentrated in offices in New
York and Los Angeles. Garry came on board three years
later, just two weeks after Ellen DeGeneres came out
and changed the face of network television.
"The person who will take over as
executive director is coming into a situation
that's very different than the one that Joan stepped
into," says Renna. "They do have a larger
infrastructure. There is a larger budget.
There's much better name recognition."
On the downside,
the new executive director will also need to address
GLAAD's high rate of turnover in key positions.
"Turnover in a rapidly growing organization is
something that is to be expected," Garry says.
"In an aggressively growing organization,
positions can outgrow people and people can outgrow
positions." The organization is also victim of both
its emotionally draining mission--dealing day in
and day out with homophobia can lead to
burnout--and its own success, Garry adds: Trained as
media coaches and crisis managers, GLAAD staffers are
highly desirable to corporations that come to them
with offers of higher-paying jobs.
As one of GLAAD's exhausted veterans,
Renna notes that the group's success speaks for
itself: "The media respects and/or fears GLAAD,
depending on who they are and what they're doing, and
that's good."
The respect often comes in the form of
unpublicized consultations between producers and GLAAD
representatives, who read scripts and offer guidance
on GLBT portrayals. It's a process that both current
and former employees stress is respectful dialogue and
not a backroom endorsement of any project. "We
do not do intense script analysis for anybody,"
Garry says. "I don't see that as our role."
The group's private access to studios and
producers has sometimes raised hackles, however. In
2000 activists incensed at Paramount Television for
developing a talk show with antigay radio personality Dr.
Laura Schlessinger accused GLAAD of being too busy
negotiating with Paramount behind closed doors to
mount grassroots protests. The group learned that
lesson quickly, joining with StopDrLaura.com for a number of
high-profile demonstrations at Paramount's gates.
Hobbled by the intense media scrutiny and by its
untelegenic host, Dr. Laura was canceled after
a single season.
GLAAD's occasional power to mortally
wound programs explains the fear Renna cites. Some
shows judged to be homophobic never make it to the
air. When Fox scheduled a two-hour straight-to-gay satirical
makeover special dubbed Seriously, Dude, I'm
Gay in 2004, GLAAD quickly criticized both the
show's concept and an early press release
saying the program dealt with "a heterosexual
male's worst nightmare: turning gay
overnight." Fox pulled the show before it aired.
"I never got a chance to defend [my
show]," says executive producer Ray Giuliani,
who is gay. To this day he has no idea how much of
Fox's decision to scuttle the series was based on
GLAAD's pressure. "I don't
understand where GLAAD's power comes from to
tell someone who is creating the show and producing the
show--a group of gay men--that this is
politically not correct," he says.
"GLAAD does so much good, but in this case you
don't even get the discussion of 'this is why
this is good, this is why it was important, this is
why I did it this way.' That's a hell of
a way to make a decision about the show."
However GLAAD may evolve after Garry's
departure, current and former employees agree that the
focus on movies, TV, and other traditional and
mainstream media--and mainstream
audiences--needs to be broadened. One growing concern
is "the power of the Internet" says
former board member John Klenert, who served for six
years. The new executive director, he says, "needs
to have an understanding and a full and total vision of how
we can continue to change. This person also has to be
ready to address the marriage issue from the get-go."
Cannick adds that the group needs to rededicate
itself to monitoring and collaborating with media
targeted to minority groups, particularly the
African-American media, and to building alliances with
groups that share GLAAD's goals, such as
progressive religious organizations.
Minority media outreach is already under way,
says Taher. She cites, for example, last year's
meeting with Spanish-language TV giant Univision. The
network's president and a group of high-level
executives attended and discussed their current crop of GLBT
characters. They also agreed to media training on GLBT
issues "with a Univision training team that
goes from affiliate to affiliate," Taher says.
"It was a big success. We do the same thing with
organizations that are African[-American] and API
[Asian and Pacific Islander] focused."
As she departs, proud of her accomplishments,
Garry says she is looking forward to taking on other
roles in the GLBT world. But GLAAD will always remain
close to her heart. "My family and I are terribly
connected to the organization and will continue to be
generous supporters, regardless of who's at the
helm, because the organization is incredibly
meaningful," she says. "So I don't ever
expect to be gone from GLAAD."