A prosecutor
showed jurors a picture of Gwen Araujo, young and lovely at
17, as he asked jurors to return murder verdicts against the
men accused of killing her. "There was a genuine human
being in the case, a living, breathing, individual
17-year-old...deprived of the right to live her life
the way she chose to live her life," prosecutor Chris
Lamiero said in his final arguments Tuesday.
Araujo was beaten, tied up, and strangled after
her friends had sex with her and discovered the pretty
teenager was biologically male, prosecutors allege.
Three men--Michael Magidson, Jose Merel, and Jason
Cazares, all 25--face first-degree murder
charges in the case, which was prosecuted as a hate
crime, adding a potential four years of imprisonment.
Jurors got the case late Tuesday after hearing
legal instructions from the judge. They are the second
panel to consider the case, following a deadlock that
led to a mistrial last year.
Araujo was born a boy named Edward but grew up
to believe her true identity was female. The
defendants, who knew her as Lida, met Araujo in late
summer 2002. Magidson and Merel had sexual encounters with
Araujo, experiences that fueled suspicions about
Araujo's gender. The issue boiled over in the early
hours of October 4, 2002, in a confrontation at
Merel's house in the San Francisco suburb of Newark.
The three defendants have taken diverse
strategies in the case. Cazares sought acquittal,
saying he was outside smoking a cigarette when the
killing took place. Magidson, who said he had gaps in his
memory from that night, acknowledged hitting and tying
up Araujo but said he did not strangle her. His
attorney asked for a manslaughter verdict, saying the
killing was not murder but a crime of passion provoked by
deception, a defense that angered Araujo's family and
many in the transgender community, who have been
watching the trial closely. Merel said he vomited and
wept when he discovered Araujo's biological identity,
slapping her and delivering a glancing blow with a pan. But
his attorney said that was the extent of Merel's
involvement, saying he was not guilty of anything more
than felony assault, if that.
Lamiero identified Magidson as the killer and
said Cazares acted as his assistant. He asked jurors
to find both guilty of first-degree murder, or at
least second-degree murder.
First-degree murder carries a sentence of 25
years to life in prison, and a second-degree
conviction brings 15 years to life; parole is rare in
either case. Lamiero made no recommendation on a verdict for Merel.
Witnesses have given sketchy and sometimes
conflicting accounts of what happened the night Araujo
died. Prosecution witness Jaron Nabors, who initially
was charged with murder but was allowed to plead to
manslaughter in exchange for testifying, said Araujo was
choked, punched, and smashed in the head with a can
and a pan. He said he did not see the killing but did
see Magidson tie up Araujo and then start to
pull a rope toward her neck.
All three defense attorneys attacked the
credibility of Nabors, accusing him of lying to cover
up his own guilt. Magidson identified Nabors as the strangler.
But in his final remarks, Lamiero defended
Nabors, pointing out that if Nabors hadn't led police
to the body buried in the Sierra foothills, the family
might still be wondering what happened. Lamiero derided the
notion that Araujo provoked her attackers and urged
jurors to bring an end to the case. "Don't let these
two murderers further stomp on this kid that they
killed," he said. "Don't let them have a final victory
by persuading you that somehow they're entitled to a break."
(AP)