Frodo and Sam sing! Yes, The Lord of the Rings has
now become a stage extravaganza, a $20
million-plus production running in Toronto with
an eye to heading to Broadway. No, there's
nothing overtly gay about The Lord of the
Rings, but in the elementary school sense, what
could be more "gay" than singing elves,
crossing swords, and the story of two rivals
fighting for the loyalty of a handsome young man with
rare taste in jewelry? (Naturally, Gollum, the
less attractive one, winds up insane and Mount Doomed.)
A friend in Toronto, who wishes to remain anonymous
because of the means by which he saw the show
before its official opening, filed this report
for The Advocate about The Lord of the Rings onstage:
All is not well
in the Shire.
When the stage
musical version of The Lord of the Rings was
announced I'm sure that many people said, "Oh,
great, dancing hobbits and a chorus line of orcs and
ents." The hobbits do dance a kind of Irish jig
a few times, a kind of Frodo-see-doh, but there are
thankfully no dancing orcs, ents, or other creatures.
They just run and jump around a lot.
People probably
also said, "How could they possibly put it
onstage?"
The answer is,
basically, they can't.
Is it a success?
No. Is it any good? In some parts, yes. Is it the first
$27 million flop? Who knows?
It's not
an excruciatingly embarrassing musical like so many that
have come before, loaded with unintentional laughs and
campy hoots, like Carrie. It's just
basically a snooze. With moments that will have
critics searching their thesauri to cleverly trash it (I
picture "Bored of the Rings" as one
possible headline), there are so many problems that
the only honest emotions generated by 50 actors, 18
musicians, countless backstage people, lots of strobe
lights, and three and a half hours are disappointment,
confusion, and occasional boredom.
Oh, you can see
the $27 million, after a fashion. The lighting is great,
the costumes expensive, the sets and effects impressive.
It's really loud. Wind blows, cymbals crash,
drums beat. Confetti is blown all over the audience.
There is an attempt to do something that's never been
done outside of opera, which is to tell a sweeping
epic story with music (most of it background, like
movie scoring). It's nothing like a traditional
musical, which is just as well. There are some cool
creatures, but nothing as impressive as anything in
The Lion King.
The story is so
complicated to begin with that we necessarily get the
Cliff Notes version, which is still too complicated for one
show. Lots of time and awkward exposition is spent
explaining stuff about all the names, histories,
races, places, etcetera, and it must surely baffle
those in the audience who come in unfamiliar with it. Since
I know the movies and books pretty well, I could keep
up, but I immediately knew what was being cut (a lot),
which distracted me from becoming involved with what
was actually being presented.
Figuring out the
various names of the characters (many of them have two
or three) also gets pretty tedious. Is he Strider now, or
Aragorn? Son of Ara-who? Who cares?
And because they
were straining to tell as much of the story as possible,
they didn't clarify what was actually important. For
example, in Leonard Bernstein's Candide
they cut the living daylights out of the original
story but preserved its essence and made a very complex
story simple, so you cared about the central
characters. Here you want to care about Frodo, and
occasionally you do, but not because of what the writers
have provided. You simply remember how much you cared about
Elijah Wood.
The focus is
split between the hobbits and Aragorn, who here is presented
as a standard warrior hero who speaks vaguely Shakespearean
English and holds his sword aloft, like a romance
novel cover model. You don't care about the
romance between him and the elf maiden, Arwen (but you
didn't care about them in the movies, either,
so it must be a built-in problem). Other characters
come and go and you get a vague sense of who they are,
sort of. But most get lost in the noise.
I wonder if the
uninitiated will have any earthly idea of what exactly
the ring is, why it's such a big deal, and why they
must destroy it. They will probably give up and flee
by intermission.
The music is hard
to evaluate, since this is probably the first musical
where 90% of the lyrics are completely unintelligible. A lot
of them are in Elvish, which is sometimes more
understandable than the English lyrics. There are lots
of interesting and sometimes beautiful chants, shouts,
wails, and choruses, like the Bombay version of Les
Miserables, but the music doesn't really add
much to the show, other than providing some emotional
moments that the script fails to. Arwen has an Elvish
power ballad, like Celine Dion at her most bizarre.
There is a grand
total of one good and understandable song, a ballad
between Frodo and Sam about how much they miss the Shire.
One of the
composers is a group from Finland, which may account for the
fact that the elf queen, Lady Galadriel, wears a costume and
headdress that looks like Bjork at an awards
show.
The special
effects are mostly good, but it seems like they ran out of
ideas about halfway through and started repeating
themselves. A few effects are very clever and threaten
to make your jaw drop, and then don't. The
orcs, which were vividly menacing in the movies (and the
imagination), are here played by athletic actors who run
around on crutches, which has the unfortunate effect
of making them look like they're competing in
the Special Olympics. The ents, the tree creatures,
are bearded men who look like ZZ Top on stilts, and
you're more interested in whether
they're going to fall than in anything they say.
There are 17
elevating stage platforms in a circle that go up and down,
rotate, and are probably an insurance liability nightmare.
They are, next to Frodo and Sam, the busiest
performers onstage. After initially impressing, their
repetition wears out their welcome pretty fast. I
thought of one of my high school theater directors whom we
had nicknamed "Mr. Platform."
The staging is a
mess. For such a big production, much of it is played on
the flat stage, and the huge proscenium sometimes swallows
up the actors. Maybe it was an attempt to make the
hobbits actually look small; but then, everyone else
is roughly their height. Much is static and boring,
the pacing both fast and sluggish.
The battle scenes
threaten to get unintentional laughs--they go on way
too long, everyone just runs around and screams a lot,
stage-stabbing each other in the armpits, and most of
the time you don't know who is fighting who or
why it matters. Many of the actors are directed to move like
Riverdancers stricken with polio. Sometimes they are
actually swinging their swords at the air at imaginary
beings, and the sound effects are working overtime to
make you think lots of creatures are there, even
though they actually aren't. You keep wondering when
they're going to show up.
At one point the
stage is covered with what looks like a giant Hefty bag,
and it writhes and shakes and people emerge from it.
Recalling The Return of the King, I realized
that it was an attempt at showing Aragorn resurrect
long-dead Ghosts for battle, but it just looked and
sounded like a bunch of people trapped in a big old Hefty
bag.
The actors all
try, but no one stands out and really connects with the
audience except the creature Gollum, who has the showiest
part and makes the most of it by throwing himself all
over the stage, screaming and wailing. He must need a
stiff drink and a massage after every performance.
Gandalf, the
wizard, is probably the center of the story, and as Brent
Carver (Kiss of the Spider Woman) plays him, he seems
to be just going along for the ride. He has no vocal
power, weight, or authority. The fact that he's
not much taller than the hobbits doesn't help.
He's a wizard because he's dressed like
one, not because of anything that comes from the
performance.
Maybe this
Gandalf is a closeted gay man who just wants to leave Middle
Earth and move to Key West.
The main problem
for me was that you're never emotionally involved
with what's going on onstage like you should be
in a show like this. They haven't focused the
show to its essence, so it wouldn't matter how much
they had cut because you really care about what is there.
Frodo and Sam are OK, but the memory of the movie
characters and how much you cared about them gets in
the way.
Maybe with more
performances they will get it. I hope so, because someone
spent a fortune on this, I hate to see all that money go
down the tubes, and I always want actors to stay
employed.
But I'm
glad it's not my money.
Viral post saying Republicans 'have two daddies now' has MAGA hot and bothered