October 16 2006 4:23 PM EST
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2026 Equal Entertainment LLC.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We need your help
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Your support makes The Advocate's original LGBTQ+ reporting possible. Become a member today to help us continue this work.
Monday, Hong Kong's government gave in to a challenge to its gay sex laws, lowering the age of consent from 21 to 16. The decision followed a humiliating government defeat in court system after an appeal against a judicial review's decision that the law governing the age of homosexual consent was unconstitutional.
Hong Kong's Security Bureau said in a statement that it would not seek to challenge the court's decision. "After considering all the relevant factors, the government decided not to appeal the judicial review."
Since Hong Kong only decriminalized homosexuality in 1991, gay and lesbian youths had faced life imprisonment if they were caught having sex before the age of 21. Their heterosexual counterparts, however, faced a five-year sentence. In a decision made by the courts in September, the law was rendered unenforceable.
"I fail to see on any basis the justification of this age limit," chief high court judge Geoffrey Ma wrote in his judgment last month. "No evidence has been placed before us to explain why the minimum age requirement for buggery is 21 whereas as far as sexual intercourse between a man and a woman is concerned, the age of consent is only 16."
The case was originally brought to the courts by William Leung, a 21-year-old gay man.
His lawyer, Michael Vidler, hailed the government decision in a statement. "Now they are not appealing it, which means they accept the fact and the court's judgment. It's about time the government initiates steps to remove the law without further delay. Failure to do so will be a slap in the face for the constitution." (The Advocate)
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Bizarre Epstein files reference to Trump, Putin, and oral sex with ‘Bubba’ draws scrutiny in Congress
November 14 2025 4:08 PM
True
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother says the ‘Bubba’ mentioned in Trump oral sex email is not Bill Clinton
November 16 2025 9:15 AM
True
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Is there a link between autism and being transgender? Here's what the science says
January 02 2026 9:00 AM
The films of bisexual actor Anthony Perkins: Beyond Psycho's Norman Bates
January 02 2026 7:00 AM
All about the Mattachine Society, the first enduring U.S. gay rights group
January 01 2026 8:00 AM
Canceled shows and record lows: How Trump is killing the Kennedy Center
January 01 2026 7:00 AM
As groundbreaking trans politician Andrea Jenkins retires, a look at her life and career
December 31 2025 5:49 PM
9 queer celebrities who made us proud in 2025
December 31 2025 4:35 PM
9 viral queer moments of 2025: From Nicki's right turn, to the 'Funeral Stud'
December 31 2025 4:30 PM
Kellyanne Conway says Trump critics need a husband — including lesbian Rosie O'Donnell
December 31 2025 2:54 PM
San Francisco green-lights affordable housing for LGBTQ+ seniors
December 31 2025 11:45 AM
Trending stories
Recommended Stories for You




































































Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the 'perfect law' — and these other heinous quotes