Former Vice
President Al Gore and the U.N.'s climate change panel won
the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for spreading
awareness of man-made climate change and laying the
foundations for counteracting it.
Gore, whose film
on global warming, An Inconvenient Truth, won
an Academy Award earlier this year, had been widely
tipped to win Friday's prize, which expanded the Norwegian
committee's interpretation of peacemaking and disarmament
efforts that have traditionally been the award's
foundations.
''We face a true
planetary emergency,'' Gore said. ''The climate crisis
is not a political issue, it is a moral and spiritual
challenge to all of humanity.''
The Nobel
committee chairman, Ole Danbolt Mjoes, asserted that the
prize was not aimed at the Bush administration, which
rejected the Kyoto accord on reducing
the pollution connected with global warming and was
widely criticized outside the United States for not taking
global warming seriously enough.
''We would
encourage all countries, including the big countries, to
challenge, all of them, to think again and to say what can
they do to conquer global warming,'' Mjoes said. ''The
bigger the powers, the better that they come in front
of this.''
Two Gore
advisers, speaking on condition of anonymity because they
are not authorized to share his thinking, said the
award will not make it any more likely that he will
seek the presidency in 2008.
If anything, the
Peace Prize makes the rough-and-tumble of a presidential
race less appealing to Gore, they said, because now he has a
huge, international platform to fight global warming
and may not want to do anything to diminish it.
One of the
advisers said that while Gore is unlikely to rule out a bid
in the coming days, the prospects of the former vice
president entering the fray in 2008 are ''extremely
remote.''
''Perhaps winning
the Nobel and being viewed as a prophet in his own time
will be sufficient,'' said Kenneth Sherrill, a political
analyst at Hunter College in New York.
Gore, who was an
advocate of stemming climate change and global warning
well before his eight years as vice president, called the
award meaningful because of his cowinner, calling the
U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change the
''world's pre-eminent scientific body devoted to
improving our understanding of the climate crisis.''
Gore plans to
donate his half of the $1.5 million prize money to the
Alliance for Climate Protection, a bipartisan nonprofit
organization that is devoted to changing public
opinion worldwide about the urgency of solving the
climate crisis.
In its citation,
the committee lauded Gore's ''strong commitment,
reflected in political activity, lectures, films and books,
has strengthened the struggle against climate change.
He is probably the single individual who has done most
to create greater worldwide understanding of the
measures that need to be adopted.''
The last American
to win the prize or share it was former president Jimmy
Carter, who won it in 2002.
At the time,
then-committee chairman Gunnar Berge called the prize
''a kick in the leg'' to the Bush administration for
its threats of war against Iraq. In response, some
members of the secretive committee criticized Berge
for expressing personal views in the panel's name.
Mjoes, elected to
succeed Berge a few months later, referred to that
dispute on Friday, saying the committee ''has never given a
kick in the leg to anyone.''
The White House
said the prize was not seen as increasing pressure on the
administration or showing that President Bush's approach
missed the mark.
''Of course he's
happy for Vice President Gore,'' White House spokesman
Tony Fratto said. ''He's happy for the international panel
on climate change scientists who also shared the Peace
Prize. Obviously it's an important recognition.''
Fratto said Bush
has no plans to call Gore.
Eighty-four
percent in the U.S. believe world temperatures are rising,
according to a poll last month by the Associated Press and
Stanford University's Woods Institute for the
Environment. Yet while about seven in 10 said they
want strong public and private action to help the
environment, fewer than one in 10 said they had seen such
steps in the past year.
In its citation
the committee said that Gore ''has for a long time been
one of the world's leading environmentalist politicians''
and cited his awareness at an early stage ''of the
climatic challenges the world is facing.
The committee
cited the IPCC for its two decades of scientific reports
that have ''created an ever-broader informed consensus about
the connection between human activities and global
warming. Thousands of scientists and officials from
over 100 countries have collaborated to achieve
greater certainty as to the scale of the warming.''
It went on to say
that because of the panel's efforts, global warming has
been increasingly recognized. In the 1980s it ''seemed to be
merely an interesting hypothesis, the 1990s produced
firmer evidence in its support. In the last few years,
the connections have become even clearer and the
consequences still more apparent.''
Rajendra
Pachauri, the IPCC chairman, said he and Gore really had
2,000 colaureates -- each of the scientists in the
U.N. panel's research network.
''This award also
thrusts a new responsibility on our shoulders,''
Pachauri said. ''We have to do more, and we have many more
miles to go.''
But some
questioned the prize decision.
''Awarding it to
Al Gore cannot be seen as anything other than a
political statement. Awarding it to the IPCC is
well-founded,'' said Bjorn Lomborg, author of The
Skeptical Environmentalist.
He criticized
Gore's film as having ''some very obvious mistakes, like
the argument that we're going to see six meters of sea-level
rise,'' he said.
''They [Nobel
committee] have a unique platform in getting people's
attention on this issue, and I regret they have used it to
make a political statement.''
In his 1895 will
creating the prize, the Swedish industrialist Alfred
Nobel said it should be awarded for efforts toward
peacemaking and disarmament, and the award now often
also recognizes human rights, democracy, elimination
of poverty, sharing resources, and the environment.
Last year, for example, it went to the Bangladeshi economist
Muhammad Yunus and his Grameen Bank for pioneering the use
of microcredit to spur creation of small businesses in
poor nations.
Jan Egeland, a
Norwegian peace mediator and former senior U.N. official
for humanitarian affairs, called climate change more than an
environmental issue.
''It is a
question of war and peace,'' said Egeland, now director of
the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs in
Oslo. ''We're already seeing the first climate wars,
in the Sahel belt of Africa.'' He said nomads and
herders are in conflict with farmers because the changing
climate has brought drought and a shortage of fertile lands.
(AP)
Viral post saying Republicans 'have two daddies now' has MAGA hot and bothered