On his first full
Sunday as bishop of the Episcopal diocese of New
Hampshire, V. Gene Robinson returned to the Peterborough,
N.H., church where he married Isabella
"Boo" McDaniel 31 years ago. Then he was a
divinity student determined to wrestle with his
homosexuality in the context of a marriage. Now
he's the openly gay bishop -- divorced from but
friendly with McDaniel -- who's the focus of millions
of Anglicans around the world, many of them wrestling
with the morality of homosexuality, especially in the
context of an ordained religious leader.
Much has changed
in 31 years.
What has not
changed is the Peterborough church itself. A compact but
stunning stone structure enclosing a soaring, cross-shaped
sanctuary, All Saints' Episcopal Church
resembles an English country church, nestled against a
tree-covered hillside. On this record-cold November morning,
Robinson arrived early to preside over services at 8 and 9
a.m. and an informal 10 a.m. community meeting before
the main event -- an 11 a.m. mass.
Robinson, 56,
isn't a local boy -- he grew up in Kentucky and now
lives in Concord -- but the congregation treated him
as family. During the formal processional that started
the final mass, for which he wore brand-new
bishop's vestments, Robinson was greeted by several
thumbs-up signs from the pews. He smiled proudly in
acknowledgment.
Family was a
recurring theme that morning. As he introduced Robinson, All
Saints' interim rector, the Reverend Bruce H.
Jacobson, recalled the bishop's November 2
installation ceremony, which took place before 4,000
people at a Durham, N.H., hockey arena. Robinson's
ex-wife was there, along with his two grown daughters,
Ella and Jamee, and his partner of 14 years, Mark
Andrew, who was also present at All Saints'.
"I watched closely Gene and his partner, Mark,
and his daughters," Jacobson said. "They
were and are a most wholesome example of a family."
After Jacobson formally presented Bishop Robinson to
the congregation, a few random claps grew into rousing
applause from the nearly 150 seated in the
church's wooden chairs and choir stall.
It was one of few
disruptions of an otherwise traditional service.
Robinson delivered his sermon, devoted to that
morning's Gospel reading, standing on the steps
between the congregation and the choir, at the very
center of the church rather than at the pulpit.
He finished his
talk with a favorite anecdote: Four American soldiers
become best friends in the trenches of France during World
War I. When one of them is killed, the others vow to
give him a proper burial. But when they ask a priest
to allow them to bury their comrade in the parish
cemetery, the priest denies their request because the men
can't guarantee that their dead friend was
baptized. Instead, the men bury the soldier just
outside the graveyard. After the war, when they return to
visit the grave, they can't find it. When they
ask the priest what happened, he explains, "I
felt bad about my decision. Why should this man not deserve
the same status before God as all these others who have gone
before him? Who am I to judge him? So I moved the
fence."
Moving the fence
to encompass more people "from the margins" is
central to Robinson's mission as bishop; he
mentions it often. But the fence had long since been
moved in Peterborough. These mostly white, middle- and
upper-middle-class churchgoers take seriously the
"Live Free or Die" motto inscribed on
their license plates. Theirs is a libertarian bent
that has less to do with proclaiming diversity in order to
embrace it than with quietly assimilating cultural
progress. They believe, as one church member put it at
a reception after the service, that "we don't
have all the answers" and that worship is about
finding the answers together.
Robinson was at
home here. The eloquence he demonstrated on the Today
show and countless other national forums, discussing
the issue of homosexuality and the church, he now bent to
the service of issues more specific to his diocese:
the social needs of New Hampshire (a topic central to
his sermon), the health of the Episcopal clergy
(he's already a national leader in creating workshops
and support groups for Episcopal priests), and the
well-being of the generations to come (youth is a
special concern).
The "baby
bishop," as he dubbed himself with a smile,does not
condemn his critics. While he may refer casually to
how God speaks to him and guides his life, he's
not inclined to tell others what God wants for them. Asked
by a church member about how he'd respond to those
Episcopalians who are threatening to leave the church
in protest of his consecration, Robinson simply
offered, "Are you going to let a little guy like me
run you off from your church?"
That seemed to
make perfect sense to those gathered this Sunday. At All
Saints', as several out-of-town visitors quickly
understood that day, church is family, in the most
inclusive sense. And the All Saints' family
turned out in force November 9 to greet and support its new
bishop. "It's only this crowded at
Christmas and Easter," one latecomer whispered after
taking a seat in a rear pew. As the service neared its end,
she whispered again: "Look! Look at the
window."
The window above
the altar had suddenly lit up -- with beams of sunlight
illuminating the stained glass -- as Robinson joined the
congregation in singing the final hymn. All
Saints' isn't the kind of congregation to
expect overt visitations of divinity. Still, eyes from all
over the sanctuary were glancing up at the influx of
light, split by the window's design into a
rainbow of colors.
On this Sunday,
it made sense.
As aware as
Robinson is of the hullabaloo surrounding his consecration,
he's equally aware of the platform it has granted him
to do God's work. "Moving the
fence" to embrace gays and lesbians is a big part of
that, but so is promoting the Episcopal Church that he
loves and that has been so good to him. "As
long as I've got the attention of the world's
media," Robinson said in one of a series of
conversations with The Advocate,
"I'm going to use it for the church and
I'm going to use it for God."
How does it feel to be bishop? It's still surreal. People are addressing
me as bishop and I have to resist looking over my
shoulder and wondering whom they're talking
about.
Your consecration certainly attracted a lot of attention. It was very interesting what was going on
outside. We had the Fred Phelps group from Kansas out
there. There were maybe a dozen antigay protesters.
The students at the University of New Hampshire had gotten
wind that they were going to be there, and the week
before the consecration they gathered all kinds of
people together. There were between 200 and 300 of
them in a counterprotest. It's important to note that
the day before the consecration I received a note from
Matthew Shepard's mother, which was just so
meaningful to me."In it she said, "I know that
Matthew will be smiling down upon you
tomorrow." I think of that in relation to what the
Fred Phelps group was doing.
How did the consecration itself go? It was just astonishingly beautiful and moving.
We had lots of non-Episcopalians there who were just
swept away, not so much by the pomp and pageantry but
by this historic thing that we were doing.
Were you worried that the ceremony might be disrupted? Believe it or not, shortly before the ceremony I
took an hour's nap. That's how Ialm I
was. Through this whole process, God has seemed so very
close by.
Was there anything about the ceremony that took you
by surprise? The moment these 44 bishops gathered around and
laid their hands on me, I was surprised at the weight
applied to the top of my head. It was really all I
could do to withstand it. It was such a powerful moment and
a physical reminder of the spiritual responsibility
being laid on me, not just in being the bishop that I
am called to be but in being in this historic
moment.
How has all of this affected your partner, Mark? He is so rock-solid. It is amazing. He is about
the steadiest person I know. It's been hard on
us because it's changed our life in the sense of
how much time we have together. But we are so together on
this. He's a very private person. For him to
agree to be in the limelight and to shoulder some of
this is just a remarkable gift to me and to the church.
I couldn't love him more.
How did you two meet? We met 16 years ago on the beach in St Croix. I
had some frequent flier miles that I needed to use. I
actually looked in The Advocate and found an ad for a
hotel on the western end of St. Croix. I flew down
there by myself, and Mark was there with a friend from
Chicago. Mark and I were immediately taken with each
other.
So have you always wanted to become a bishop? No. I used to be one of those people who
laughingly said anybody who wanted to be a bishop
deserved it. It always seemed inappropriate to me to
aspire to it. But about 10 years ago, I began to literally
be pursued by God about this. It began to creep into
my prayer life. Also, my attitude changed, once I
worked for a bishop, from one of "anyone who
wants to be a bishop deserves it" to thinking that
being a bishop is so hard, you'd better want to
do it. Even on a good day it's a tough job, and
on a bad day it's nearly impossible. I can't
imagine going into this sort of begrudging it. It used
to be fashionable for nominees to claim they
didn't want it. For me, it was more complicated,
because I did know that if I was ever nominated, much
less elected, I would become a flash point for
controversy.
So how is it different than being an openly gay priest? I didn't have to think a lot about it. We
forget in New England what a rarified atmosphere we
have compared to most of the country. I came out in
this diocese in 1986. It's never been a focus of my
ministry, but it's certainly something that I
haven't shied away from. One of the great
inconsistencies in all the controversy these last few months
is that for some reason everybody has gone over the
edge because I'm about to become a bishop,
whereas if they were being consistent at all, they would be
as outraged by my being a priest. It makes no
sense.
Did you know you were gay when you became a priest and
later got married? Absolutely. I started seminary in 1969, two or
three months after Stonewall. I had been struggling
with this for quite some time, and all of my
significant relationships had been with men. But then I got
into therapy for a couple of years to cure myself. I
really wanted to be married. I wanted to have
children. I felt that I was in a place that I could
have a mature relationship with a woman, and indeed, I met
Isabella and we were married. But I told her within a
month of our meeting that all of my relationships had
been with men. About a month before we were married I
remember breaking down one night and crying and saying that
I was so fearful that this would raise its ugly head
at some point. Flash forward about 10 years, and it
was. I was increasingly feeling that I could not
continue to deny who I was. We made a mutual decision. We
felt that she deserved the opportunity to know a
relationship with a heterosexual man and that I
deserved the opportunity to make my life with a
man.
She sounds very understanding. We both felt that we were honoring each other by
letting each other go. In a strange kind of
upside-down way, we were honoring our marriage by
getting a divorce. We took an Episcopal priest with us to
the judge's chamber for the final divorce
decree, and we immediately went from there back to his
church and celebrated communion together. We asked for each
other's forgiveness, we cried a lot, and we gave our
wedding rings back to each other.
Did you enter the priesthood as a way of dealing with
being gay? I don't see that my being gay had
anything to do with my decision to respond to
God's call to ordination. I have always been very
close to the church.
Even as a young boy? I grew up in the Disciples of Christ
denomination, in a small rural church in
Nicholasville, Ky. By the time I got into high school I was
beginning to question. I was in a fairly fundamentalist
congregation, and I would ask all kinds of questions,
such as "How could a loving God send people to
hell if they have never even heard of Jesus?" The
response from the adults in my church was
"There are certain questions you shouldn't
ask." Well, even by high school I was convinced that
there wasn't any question that shouldn't
be asked. When I left high school I was looking for
something more open. I wound up at a college that was owned
by the 20 or so Southern dioceses of the Episcopal
Church. I was confirmed in the Episcopal Church Easter
of my senior year and went to seminary that
fall.
So what does the V. in your name stand for? I weighed 10 pounds when I was born and my
mother is a very small woman, so the birth was very
difficult. They couldn't do a C-section, and six
doctors failed to extricate me. At the last minute one of
the nurses called in a pediatrician, who was able to
deliver me [using forceps]. I was completely paralyzed
on my right side, and my head was crushed in. They
asked my father for a name for the birth and death
certificates, knowing I would not live. My father used
the name Vicki Jean that they had chosen for a girl,
figuring it would not matter on my tombstone. He just
changed the spelling to Vicky Gene. I was in the incubator
for about a month and then came out of paralysis. I
was given to my parents, who were poor tobacco
sharecroppers and quite young, and told that I would
never walk or talk, that I would be a total vegetable. I
didn't learn any of this until I was 13 and my
pediatrician told me. Every time I went to see him he
would say, "You sure look better than the first time
I saw you." He told me that my head had been so
crushed in that he took his hands and molded it back
into a round shape. He knew I wouldn't live, but
he couldn't bear to let my mother see me in a casket
that way.
Wow. What a thing to learn about yourself. But now your
focus must be on your congregants. What's
first on your "to do" list as bishop? My first order of business is visiting
congregations. And in addition to doing what I would
normally do, such as worship services and preaching,
I'm holding forums so that people who are
uncomfortable with my election or angry about it will
have a chance to ask any questions of me that they
want.
A bishop holding forums so that congregants can express
their anger about his election sounds like a
radical new thing. Yes. But what's so great about it is it
becomes a substantive discussion about what makes us a
church. These are fantastic discussions. Frankly,
because of my election and the controversy around it, there
is not an Episcopal congregation in the country that
isn't asking that. This is an enormous
educational and spiritual opportunity. It's not a bad
way to begin an episcopate. Rather than everybody
standing around drinking tea and making nice,
we're having these remarkably deep and meaningful
discussions about what we really believe and why we really
believe it.
How are you going to handle all the conflicting things
that surround your new position, such as being a
role model and a bishop, and the potential church schism? They do amazingly dovetail. They're not
separate things. How I go about answering tough
questions in a congregation says a lot about the kind of
person I'm going to be as a bishop. And the people
here at the diocese have just been absolutely
wonderful about understanding this historic role that
I'm playing. I joke with them about all the news
coverage. We couldn't buy this kind of
publicity for the Episcopal Church.
What have you personally been hearing from the gay community? My mail, my e-mail, and my phone calls have
probably been running about 90% positive. People are
saying things like "Thank you so much for doing
this"; "Thank you for standing firm";
"Please don't back down now"; and
"You can't imagine what this means to me
living in this tiny town in Georgia where it's
not safe to come out."
Speaking of not backing down, you have taken a defiant
stance, given the magnitude of the potential schism. I have always taken seriously the pleas that
have come my way for me to go slow or be careful. But
I've never wavered in my understanding that God
was calling me forth to do this. Some people would have
called Moses defiant when he led the Hebrews out of
Egypt. Some called Jesus defiant when against all the
Jewish law he touched and treated with respect lepers
and women and tax collectors. Martin Luther King and many
others were accused of being defiant while doing what
most of us believe to be God's will. I would
like to think that I've just been resolute.
You have compared this crisis to past crises the church
has weathered, such as the ordination of women. Do
you still think it will eventually blow over? This is not unlike the controversy over the
ordination of women. There were great threats of
schism back then, and it really never materialized.
With every day that passes, and people see that life within
their congregation hasn't changed because New
Hampshire has a gay bishop, there will be fewer and
fewer people interested in doing something about
it.
But throughout history, many churches have split. Ultimately, a church based on unhappiness and
anger is not apt to succeed. Who would want to belong
to a church whose raison d'etre was
displeasure?
Is there any level of damage to the church caused by your
election that would cause you to step down? I can't step down now. I'm a
bishop until the day I die. Someday I may retire, but
the fact that the church has done this cannot be undone. If
it were possible? No, I don't think so.
Do you feel any responsibility to the gay Episcopalians
who are members of a church threatening to break
away because of your consecration? I can't have any responsibility for them
other than in hoping that the things I'm saying
and doing are encouraging to them. I cannot act in any
other diocese without the bishop's permission. I
worry about them. I pray about them. But I
can't be responsible for them, and I agonize over
that.
If we could magically take the controversy away, what
would you like to be talking about? I'll tell you what I'm going to be
talking to the diocese about. There's a passage
in Isaiah that Jesus read in his hometown synagogue. It goes
something like, "The spirit of the Lord is upon me to
preach good news to the poor, to set captives free, to
restore sight to the blind, and to proclaim the year
of the Lord's favor." I'm thinking that
passage is going to be the centerpiece of my
episcopate here. I want my ministry to be about
noticing people on the edges and bringing them into the
center of the church.
When you talk about people on the edges, I automatically
think of gay people. Absolutely. But it's more than just gay
people. Three days after my election I got a letter
from a woman in the state prison here who wrote,
"I am neither gay nor Christian, but your election
makes me think there might be a community out there
who could love me despite what I've done."
I went down and played softball with the women at that
prison, and I met this young woman. She turned out to
be 18 years old. She looked about 15--very
quiet, shy, sort of a wallflower. She had killed her mother
when she was 14, yet she saw hope for herself in my
election.