World
CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2024 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Stating that someone is gay, regardless of whether the person is, cannot be considered slanderous in New Jersey, a U.S. district court judge ruled last week.
Judge Joel Pisano ruled that two radio shock jocks, Craig Carton and Ray Rossi, on WKXW 101.5 FM in Trenton, would not have to paying damages to freelance photographer Peter Murphy. In 2006, Carton and Rossi posed for a photo by Murphy, which was included in New Jersey Monthly magazine. The photo was a shot of them naked with only a placard featuring the station's name held up to cover their midsections, according to the New Jersey Law Journal.
As a promotional push, the station asked listeners to alter the photo, but did so without crediting Murphy as the original photographer. When listeners submitted their own versions of the photos with Michael Jackson or former New Jersey governor Richard Codey, Murphy's lawyers sent a cease-and-desist letter in June 2007.
After the letter arrived, Carton and Rossi went on the air complaining about how Murphy made them pose for the shoot, implying that he was gay. They also said that Murphy was "a man not to be trusted" and that he "will sue you."
Murphy then sued on the basis of defamation and copyright infringement.
Judge Pisano ruled that because the 2006 case that said civil unions would be treated equally to marriages, "it appears unlikely that the New Jersey Supreme Court would legitimize discrimination against gays and lesbians by concluding that referring to someone as homosexual 'tends to so harm the reputation of that person as to lower him in the estimation of the community as to deter third persons from associating or dealing with him.'"
The gay references were "nothing more than rhetorical hyperbole, name calling or verbal abuse."
The judge also rejected the copyright claims, holding that the fair use doctrine applied to the use of the original photograph and the altered versions. He said that the photo appeared in the magazine, not with copyright notice, but with a photo credit added to the design of the page.
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
18 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
October 30 2024 11:06 AM
True
After 20 years, and after tonight, Obama will no longer be the Democrats' top star
August 20 2024 12:28 PM
Trump ally Laura Loomer goes after Lindsey Graham: ‘We all know you’re gay’
September 13 2024 2:28 PM
60 wild photos from Folsom Street East that prove New York City knows how to play
June 21 2024 12:25 PM
Melania Trump cashed six-figure check to speak to gay Republicans at Mar-a-Lago
August 16 2024 5:57 PM
If you think Project 2025 is scary, take a look at Donald Trump's Agenda 47
July 09 2024 2:35 PM
Latest Stories
Nancy Mace supported an LGBTQ+ equality bill before pushing a transgender bathroom ban
November 21 2024 4:08 PM
Ex-marine who allegedly tore down tattoo shop's Pride flag charged with hate crime
November 21 2024 3:35 PM
'A betrayal': Trans people respond to Sarah McBride's bathroom ban compliance
November 21 2024 12:36 PM
Jussie Smollett’s homophobic hoax conviction overturned by Illinois Supreme Court
November 21 2024 12:02 PM
Watch AOC slam Nancy Mace for 'endangering all women' with transgender bathroom ban
November 21 2024 11:40 AM
82% of trans workers have suffered discrimination or harassment: report
November 21 2024 11:18 AM
Tom of Finland Art & Culture Festival returns to L.A. just in time for the holidays
November 21 2024 8:54 AM