World
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Stating that someone is gay, regardless of whether the person is, cannot be considered slanderous in New Jersey, a U.S. district court judge ruled last week.
Judge Joel Pisano ruled that two radio shock jocks, Craig Carton and Ray Rossi, on WKXW 101.5 FM in Trenton, would not have to paying damages to freelance photographer Peter Murphy. In 2006, Carton and Rossi posed for a photo by Murphy, which was included in New Jersey Monthly magazine. The photo was a shot of them naked with only a placard featuring the station's name held up to cover their midsections, according to the New Jersey Law Journal.
As a promotional push, the station asked listeners to alter the photo, but did so without crediting Murphy as the original photographer. When listeners submitted their own versions of the photos with Michael Jackson or former New Jersey governor Richard Codey, Murphy's lawyers sent a cease-and-desist letter in June 2007.
After the letter arrived, Carton and Rossi went on the air complaining about how Murphy made them pose for the shoot, implying that he was gay. They also said that Murphy was "a man not to be trusted" and that he "will sue you."
Murphy then sued on the basis of defamation and copyright infringement.
Judge Pisano ruled that because the 2006 case that said civil unions would be treated equally to marriages, "it appears unlikely that the New Jersey Supreme Court would legitimize discrimination against gays and lesbians by concluding that referring to someone as homosexual 'tends to so harm the reputation of that person as to lower him in the estimation of the community as to deter third persons from associating or dealing with him.'"
The gay references were "nothing more than rhetorical hyperbole, name calling or verbal abuse."
The judge also rejected the copyright claims, holding that the fair use doctrine applied to the use of the original photograph and the altered versions. He said that the photo appeared in the magazine, not with copyright notice, but with a photo credit added to the design of the page.
Recommended Stories for You
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
31 Period Films of Lesbians and Bi Women in Love That Will Take You Back
December 09 2024 1:00 PM
18 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
October 30 2024 11:06 AM
True
After 20 years, and after tonight, Obama will no longer be the Democrats' top star
August 20 2024 12:28 PM
Trump ally Laura Loomer goes after Lindsey Graham: ‘We all know you’re gay’
September 13 2024 2:28 PM
Melania Trump cashed six-figure check to speak to gay Republicans at Mar-a-Lago
August 16 2024 5:57 PM
More Videos
0 seconds of 1 minute, 54 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
Keyboard Shortcuts
Shortcuts Open/Close/ or ?
Play/PauseSPACE
Increase Volume↑
Decrease Volume↓
Seek Forward→
Seek Backward←
Captions On/Offc
Fullscreen/Exit Fullscreenf
Mute/Unmutem
Decrease Caption Size-
Increase Caption Size+ or =
Seek %0-9
Copied
Live
00:00
01:54
01:54
Latest Stories
Exclusion will be the norm in the military Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump want
January 14 2025 5:21 PM
Watch a gay Texas lawmaker propose to his partner at the state Capitol building
January 15 2025 10:00 AM
Take a long, hard look at the Real Nasty Pigs of New York
January 14 2025 4:20 PM
Apple, Costco stand behind DEI programs
January 14 2025 12:38 PM
New Jersey Democratic state Sen. Paul Sarlo calls trans women men and advocates for sports ban
January 14 2025 10:54 AM
Nazi regalia leads to Tom of Finland cofounder's ouster as IML judge
January 15 2025 8:49 AM
Why putting free period products in men's bathrooms is good for everyone
January 14 2025 3:03 PM