World
CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2024 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Anti-marriage equality forces defending California's Proposition 8 in federal court reiterated their opposition on Monday to broadcasting the closing arguments in the trial, currently scheduled for June 16.
In a letter to U.S. district judge Vaughn R. Walker, attorney Charles J. Cooper wrote that allowing cameras in the courtroom would violate an earlier stay order by the U.S. Supreme Court, which in January blocked broadcast of trial proceedings as part of a pilot project previously approved by a judicial council of the ninth circuit court of appeals. The high court ruled that lower courts "did not follow appropriate procedures," including giving "appropriate public notice and an opportunity to comment" before allowing webcasts of the trial. Such a high-profile case, the court's majority ruled, was not suited for a pilot program.
Cooper's letter is in response to a new request to broadcast closing arguments of Perry v. Schwarzenegger by a media coalition that includes CNN, the Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC News. The group argued in part that closing arguments "will solely consist of the arguments of counsel -- and not witness testimony or evidence."
"The concerns earlier reviewed by the Supreme Court should not preclude this opportunity to enhance the public's ability to witness the parties' respective closing arguments in this case," attorneys for the media coalition wrote in a Tuesday letter.
Cooper said that counsel could still possibly include videotaped depositions of expert witnesses during their closing arguments, however.
Video clips of some of those depositions are already widely available on the Internet, including those of two defense expert witnesses, Paul NathansonandKatherine Young, who did not ultimately testify in court.
Prop. 8 backers have vigorously fought broadcasting of the trial, claiming cameras would lead to witness intimidation and, as Cooper wrote on Monday, would have "negative effects on some judges and attorneys, including distraction, grandstanding, and avoidance of unpopular decisions or positions."
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Meet all 37 of the queer women in this season's WNBA
April 17 2024 11:24 AM
Here are the 15 gayest travel destinations in the world: report
March 26 2024 9:23 AM
16 of the most batsh*t things N.C. Republican governor candidate Mark Robinson has said
September 16 2024 1:42 PM
True
After 20 years, and after tonight, Obama will no longer be the Democrats' top star
August 20 2024 12:28 PM
More Than 50 of Our Favorite LGBTQ+ Moms
May 12 2024 11:44 AM
Latest Stories
Out100 Honoree Tony Valenzuela thanks queer and trans communities for support in his HIV journey
September 18 2024 12:00 PM
Kentucky bans conversion therapy for youth as Gov. Andy Beshear signs 'monumental' order
September 18 2024 11:13 AM
President Biden slams Donald Trump, Project 2025, and Clarence Thomas over anti-LGBTQ+ prejudice
September 18 2024 10:29 AM
Neo-Nazi convicted of plotting a terrorist attack on an LGBTQ+ group
September 18 2024 10:13 AM
Harris-Walz campaign slams Trump, Vance, and Republicans for not supporting IVF protection bill
September 17 2024 7:10 PM
74% of LGBTQ+ Americans prefer Kamala Harris: HRC report
September 17 2024 7:05 PM