![Immigrationx390%281%29_0](https://www.advocate.com/media-library/immigrationx390-281-29-0.jpg?id=32716830&width=1200&height=876)
CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2024 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
An LGBT immigration rights group is calling on the Obama administration to use restraint in deportation proceedings involving married, binational gay couples pending ultimate resolution of the current legal challenges to section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act.
In written requests delivered Thursday to Atty. Gen. Eric Holder and Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, the group, Immigration Equality, also called upon immigration officials to hold green card applications submitted on behalf of spouses of LGBT American citizens or legal residents until DOMA's constitutionality is settled by the courts. Such a move, if enacted, could allow a noncitizen spouse to remain in the country pending such legal resolution.
"Of the many rights that flow from marriage, none is more immediate than the right to petition for lawful permanent residence for a foreign-born husband or wife," Immigration Equality executive director Rachel B. Tiven and legal director Victoria Neilson wrote in the letter to Attorney General Holder. "Every day American families are torn apart because Section 3 of DOMA prevents a foreign spouse from obtaining lawful permanent residence."
Regarding deportation cases involving gay and lesbian spouses, Tiven and Neilson wrote that staying such removal proceedings "is the only way to ensure that the constitutional rights of American citizens are not being violated" until the DOMA cases are resolved.
Tiven told The Advocate that her organization's request to put green card application reviews on hold does not mean Immigration Equality is recommending that citizens apply for a green card on behalf of their noncitizen gay spouses in all cases. Individual cases vary on factors such as state of residency and current immigration status. Rather, she said her group is urging the administration to treat fairly those who may have already filed or may be in the process of filing.
Immigration Equality's letters come amid a growing call by both advocates and lawmakers for parity in cases of legally married gay and lesbian couples who are denied the same right as straight married couples to sponsor a noncitizen spouse or who are facing deportation proceedings.
Last month Holder announced that the
Justice Department would no
longer defend the constitutionality of DOMA's section 3 in several
pending lawsuits, though it would continue to enforce the law. But some
advocates argue that immigration officials have discretionary power to
delay imminent deportations in cases of married gay couples.
In
the letter, Immigration Equality called on Holder to
instruct the Executive Office for Immigration Review "to grant long
continuances in removal proceedings where the foreign national could
adjust status based on his or her marriage to a U.S. citizen or lawful
permanent resident were it not for DOMA."
Lavi Soloway,
an attorney in private practice and a cofounder of Immigration
Equality, has taken a similar stance involving clients faced with
deportation proceedings. In one client case, a U.S. immigration judge
last week ordered an emergency stay on the deportation of Rodrigo
Martinez, who married his partner, Edwin Echegoyen, in Washington, D.C.,
earlier this month.
"Edwin and Rodrigo fall squarely at the intersection of this new position," Soloway said last week
of the administration and its stance on section 3 of DOMA, which bans
the federal government from recognizing the marriages of same-sex
couples. "This is an important act of protest ... and the beginning of a
process by which they may one day receive the green card for Rodrigo
that they deserve."
Soloway has argued that the Department of
Homeland Security in recent years has amply used its powers of
discretion in other situations. In 2009 it issued a moratorium against
deporting widows or widowers of U.S. citizens who had been married for
less than two years while Congress considered a legislative fix, one
supported by the administration.
Representatives Jerrold Nadler of New York and Zoe Lofgren of California have both called on
executive branch agencies to halt deportation proceedings in cases such
as Martinez's. "If it's the case of a legally married couple under the
laws of a state or the District of Columbia, the administration ought to
argue in court not to deport them," Nadler told The Advocate earlier this month.
Nadler joined House Democratic colleagues Wednesday in the
reintroduction of the Respect for Marriage Act, which would repeal DOMA.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California is leading efforts on the Senate
bill with cosponsors including New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand and
Delaware senator Chris Coons.
Read Immigration Equality's written request to Holder on the following page.
Immigration Equality's written appeal to Attorney General Holder:
Dear Attorney General Holder:
Thank you for the courageous action you took on February 23, 2011 in announcing that the Department of Justice ("DOJ") would no longer defend the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") in federal law suits. We applaud your decision and believe that this is a critical step forward in ensuring equality under the constitution for all Americans and their families.
We write to request that until there is a final resolution in the DOMA litigation, you instruct the Board of Immigration Appeals to hold in abeyance the appeals of immigrant visa petitions (I-130) filed by American citizens or lawful permanent residents on behalf of their lesbian or gay spouses. We ask further that you instruct the Executive Office for Immigration Review ("EOIR") to grant long continuances in removal proceedings where the foreign national could adjust status based on his or her marriage to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident were it not for DOMA. While we understand that your letter explained that until there is a final resolution in the DOMA litigation, the Administration would continue to enforce DOMA, staying removals is the only way to maintain the status quo for these families pending the final resolution of the DOMA cases. Where the validity of a law has been so clearly called into question the most appropriate response for the Administration is to hold cases directly affected by the law.
Of the many rights that flow from marriage, none is more immediate than the right to petition for lawful permanent residence for a foreign-born husband or wife. Every day American families are town apart because Section 3 of DOMA prevents the foreign spouse from obtaining lawful permanent residence. The EOIR immigration judges are employees of DOJ and it would be unjust for immigration judges to continue to order removals of the lesbian and gay spouses of Americans by enforcing a law that you have determined is unconstitutional. Staying removals of gay and lesbian spouses is the only way to ensure that the constitutional rights of American citizens are not being violated pending the final resolution of the DOMA cases. Maintaining the status quo for these families at this point will also preserve judicial resources by preventing potentially hundreds of immigration-based federal DOMA challenges in individual cases.
Want more breaking equality news & trending entertainment stories?
Check out our NEW 24/7 streaming service: the Advocate Channel!
Download the Advocate Channel App for your mobile phone and your favorite streaming device!
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Meet all 37 of the queer women in this season's WNBA
April 17 2024 11:24 AM
Here are the 15 gayest travel destinations in the world: report
March 26 2024 9:23 AM
After 20 years, and after tonight, Obama will no longer be the Democrats' top star
August 20 2024 12:28 PM
More Than 50 of Our Favorite LGBTQ+ Moms
May 12 2024 11:44 AM
Conjoined twins Lori Schappell and trans man George Schappell dead at 62
April 27 2024 6:13 PM
Latest Stories
How 'Skincare' tackles women's aging, consent, and othering a queer-coded Latino
September 04 2024 8:00 PM
Here are the 25 transgender Americans lost to violence so far this year
September 04 2024 3:35 PM
Ben Platt marries Noah Galvin in New York celebration
September 04 2024 3:15 PM
53 years ago, Jack Baker and Michael McConnell became the first same-sex couple to wed
September 04 2024 2:27 PM
Even Republicans are against Tennessee’s trans health ban
September 04 2024 1:05 PM
And they're off! 8 things to watch for as the 2024 presidential election kicks into high gear
September 04 2024 10:00 AM
Tim Walz to honor LGBTQ+ community at Human Rights Campaign National Dinner (exclusive)
September 04 2024 9:00 AM
A Virginia college bans transgender students — based on language from the year 1900
September 04 2024 5:39 AM
Harris campaign, others call out Trump for holding events in towns with racist histories
September 04 2024 4:57 AM
Candace Owens claims TikTok makes men gay and causes women to hate them
September 03 2024 6:27 PM
16 LGBTQ+ movies & TV shows to watch in September 2024
September 03 2024 4:21 PM
Transphobic Texas Democrat finds home for bigotry in state Republican Party
September 03 2024 4:07 PM