It's not
surprising that Sean Penn, thanks to his star turn as Harvey
Milk in Gus Van Sant's biopic Milk, is
becoming a hero to gays. His performance is moving and,
judging by the archival film footage, flawless; Penn
simultaneously renders Milk as a figure of historic
importance and a vulnerable individual with a
sparkling sense of humor. Aside from the acting prizes he
will surely win (and deservingly), Penn is likely to
earn himself the iconic status of "straight
ally," a heterosexual who goes out of his way to take
a stand for gay rights and is thus showered with
praise from gays. A GLAAD Media Award, honors from the
Human Rights Campaign, and a slew of prizes from other
prominent gay rights organizations are only a matter of
time.
Which is a shame,
because Penn's political activism, irrespective of
his views on gay rights, negates the values for which
a movement based upon individual freedom must stand.
The same week
that Milk premiered in theaters, The
Nation published a cover story by Penn based on
interviews he conducted recently with Hugo Chavez and
Raul Castro, the dictators of Venezuela and Cuba
respectively. The article is a love letter to the two
men, defending them against all manner of Western
"propaganda." It hearkens back to the
notorious dispatches penned by Westerners fresh from
the Soviet Union who reported on the amazing progress
of the workers' paradise. These worshipful epistles,
often published in The Nation, neglected to
mention anything about the gulag, the
"disappearance" of political dissidents,
the Ukrainian famine, or any other such inconvenient
truths about communism. Lenin termed the individuals who
delivered these apologetics "useful idiots,"
and Penn and his enablers are nothing if not that.
Penn traveled to
the region with the polemicist Christopher Hitchens, and
while the loquacious Chavez was happy to entertain both men,
the reclusive Castro was a harder get. Penn's
long-standing defense of the communist regime in Cuba,
however, must have endeared him to the Castro
brothers, as Raul decided to grant an interview only with
the actor. The import of a communist dictator
purposely deciding to sit for an interview with Penn
and not Hitchens, who would have been less -- how to put it?
-- deferential in his line of questioning, was
apparently lost on the movie star and his readers.
Reporting on his dinnertime conversation, Penn
dutifully made all the standard arguments in defense of the
Cuban regime, from pointing out that the Communist
Party would win 80% of the vote in an open election to
morally equating the United States' Guantanamo Bay
prison to Cuban jails that house the Castro brothers'
political enemies.
It's only
in the closing moments of his otherwise adulatory,
seven-hour interview that Penn bothers to ask about
human rights abuses on the island, and just the
"allegations" of abuses at that. The lack of
interest in individual liberty, hardly surprising for a
far-left fellow traveler like Penn, is nonetheless
ironic given the Cuban regime's treatment of
gay people, a subject that one suspects Penn might have some
interest in given his critically acclaimed performance in
Milk. Not long after the Cuban revolution, Fidel
Castro ordered the internment of gay people in prison labor
camps, where they were murdered or worked to death for
their "counterrevolutionary tendencies."
Over the gate of
one of these camps were the words "Work Will Make Men
Out of You," an eerie homage to the welcome sign at
Auschwitz instructing Jews on their way to the gas
chambers that "Work Will Make You Free."
(The plight of gays in the Cuban revolution is movingly told
in the novel Before Night Falls by Reinaldo
Arenas, made into a film starring Javier Bardem.
Playing a gay character in a film that has both an
antitotalitarian and pro-gay message, Bardem is an
"ally" less morally compromised than Penn.) In
the early years of the regime, Raul Castro was
notorious for ordering the summary execution of its
opponents, including people whose only crime was their
homosexuality. This is the man with whom Penn was
"in stitches" knocking back glasses of
red wine.
While
homosexuality has since been decriminalized in Cuba, the
communist government bans gay organizations, as it
does any organization critical of the regime.
"There
isn't a single individual that is taken seriously in
the human rights community -- whether you're
talking about Amnesty International, Human Rights
Watch, or Freedom House -- that would describe the Castro
brothers and their regime as anything other than a police
state run by thugs and murderers," says Thor
Halvorssen, president of the Human Rights Foundation,
which focuses on Latin America. "That Sean Penn would
be honored by anyone, let alone the gay community, for
having stood by a dictator that put gays into
concentration camps is mind-boggling."
Penn's
credibility as an effective advocate for gay rights is also
weakened by the generally illiberal policies of the Cuban
and Venezuelan regimes. Chavez, in spite of
Penn's apologetics to the contrary, is no
democrat; the record of his rule is unmistakably
authoritarian. The latest State Department human
rights report cites the following government
infringements in just the past few years: "unlawful
killings; disappearances reportedly involving security
forces; torture and abuse of detainees; harsh prison
conditions; arbitrary arrests and detentions; a
corrupt, inefficient, and politicized judicial system
characterized by trial delays, impunity, and
violations of due process; searches without warrants
of private homes; official intimidation and attacks on the
independent media; government-promoted anti-Semitism;
widespread corruption at all levels of government;
violence against women; trafficking in persons; and
restrictions on workers' right of association."
Chavez has also
cavorted on the world stage with individuals like Iranian
president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Zimbabwean tyrant Robert
Mugabe, trying to form a bloc of third-world,
authoritarian regimes to stand in opposition to the
West. Penn, playing the role of the apparatchik almost
as well as he did the former San Francisco supervisor,
doesn't bother to ask Chavez about any of these
manifold abuses or associations, preferring to repeat
without skepticism the crazed dictator's claim that
the United States is plotting an invasion of his
country. "It's true, Chavez may not be a good
man," Penn declares. "But he may well be a
great one."
That Penn would
write an homage to Latin American caudillos is
nothing new, as both he and The Nation have sung the
praises of anti-American dictators for quite some
time. Indeed, Penn fancies himself something of a
foreign correspondent.
In December 2002
he traveled to Baghdad to meet with cronies of Saddam
Hussein -- the killer of hundreds of thousands, if not over
a million people -- to defend the Ba'athist
regime against impending war. Penn hobnobbed with
notorious individuals like Tariq Aziz, the deputy prime
minister infamous as the public face of the Hussein regime,
and pleaded on their behalf. This is not to condemn
the notion of antiwar activism, but there were
principled arguments to be made against the Iraq War and
means of arguing against it that didn't require the
knowing exploitation of oneself as a propaganda tool
for a totalitarian regime. While Penn nary has a word
of criticism about genuine tyrants and terrorists, last
year he delivered a speech naming senior American government
officials as "villainously and criminally
obscene people" (Chavez proudly read the letter
on state television).
Why should anyone
care about an actor's politics? The bloviations of
Hollywood stars tend to be ignorant and irrelevant to those
interested in serious debate about the issues of the
day, but Penn's grandstanding matters due to
both his role in Milk and the film's
political relevance in the context of Proposition 8 and the
nationwide campaign for gay rights. Gay rights are human
rights, as Milk said, and Penn discredits both when he
rationalizes illiberal ideologies as
"anti-imperialist" and rushes to the defense
of thugs who posture as victims of the West.
Penn's ignoble political side projects taint a noble
cause.