New York Times Endorses Marriage Equality on the Ballot

The New York Times editorial board today formally endorsed marriage equality as it appears on the ballot next month in Maine, Maryland, and Washington.

"The freedom to marry is a fundamental right that should not have to be won or defended at the ballot box," says the editorial. "In fact, ballot initiatives are a bad way to write or rewrite laws of any kind. Unfortunately, that is the reality of American politics, which is why same-sex marriage measures on the Nov. 6 ballot in Maine, Washington, Maryland and Minnesota could turn out to be pivotal in the struggle for marriage equality.

The Times editorial points out that marriage equality has never won a ballot referendum, but highlights that this year could be history-making in that capacity. With legislatively approved marriage equality bills pending voter approval in Maryland and Washington, The Times turns its attention to Maine, which it claims "probably has the best chance of winning." According to the editorial, that's because three years ago, when Maine voters rejected a marriage equality bill, "supporters of the freedom to marry went right back to knocking on doors, raising money, honing their arguments and organizing for a new vote this fall to leglize same-sex marriages."

Trending stories

​'Naked Gun' trailer: Liam Neeson dons drag, reveals strawberry panties​

Beyond Wonderland's accepting & unifying rave culture is needed more than ever

Elon Musk uses burner accounts on X, doesn’t fact-check: report

Season 4 of The Switch on resilience & radical self-love returns this spring

'White Lotus' star Arnas Fedaravicius reacts to gays flooding his DMs

Dylan Efron dishes on his sexy back arch & Speedo pics: 'That's what I'm good at!'

When Lady Gaga met Chappell Roan, she made sure to tell her this

All 6 rogue Mississippi cops got long prison sentences in 'Goon Squad' torture of 2 Black men

How climate disasters hurt mental health in young people

Matt Bomer reveals his favorite 'Fellow Travelers' sex scene with Jonathan Bailey

Ranking NWSL teams by how gay the name is

The Charles is Pacific Grove's new LGBTQ+ hotel

Trump's orders prompt CDC to erase HIV resources

Robert Irwin is stripping down & rocking tiny briefs in new underwear campaign

Broadway's best raise over $1 million for LGBTQ+ and HIV causes

Cowboys & Queens U.S. tour by Jane Hilton: A modern American dream

Here's what the 'White Lotus' stars revealed about the season 3 finale

Broadway bound: The best hotels in NYC’s Theater District for every type of traveler

Gerald Garth is keeping people of color happy and healthy through trying times

Peaches Christ says she's been 'retraumatized' by police investigating drag icon Heklina's death

Joe Biden has tied the record for most LGBTQ+ judges confirmed in federal courts

Tracy Chapman's debut album turns 35: Watch these iconic performances

Discover the power of Wellness in your life

Out and About with Karan Soni

France becomes world’s first country to enshrine abortion rights in constitution

• 0
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8

The editorial also addresses the marriage-related ballot initiative in Minnesota, which asks voters to amend the constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Given that the state already has a ban on same-sex marriage, The Times gives Minnesota voters the benefit of the doubt, writing "it is hard to believe that a majority of Minnesotans would opt to place their state so sharply on the wrong side of fairness."

New York legalized marriage equality last year in a bipartisan vote on a bill signed into law by Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who ran on a platform promising to bring marriage equality to the Empire State. Read the entire editorial from The Timeshere.