Senate OK's Defense Bill Without Anti-LGBTQ+ Provisions, Setting Up Fight With House
Fights are likely over individual appropriations bills as well.
July 28, 2023
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Fights are likely over individual appropriations bills as well.
By a surprisingly bipartisan vote of 224-200, the House on Thursday passed an amendment banning the use of federal funds to support D.C.'s domestic-partner registry. The White House warned that President Bush would veto this year's routine appropriations bill for the District of Columbia if it did not include such an amendment.
Democrats had originally been eyeing a Senate vote before this fall's midterms.
The vote isn't final passage, but it's a key step forward.
The chairman of
the House Judiciary Committee has eliminated hate-crimes
provisions benefiting gays and lesbians from a child
safety bill. The language had been added to the
Children's Safety and Violent Crimes Reduction Act of
2005 on a strong bipartisan vote last fall, but
Republican Congressman James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin used
a procedural move to get rid of it.
Beyond protecting marriage equality, though, more needs to be done to assure equal rights for LGBTQ+ Americans, they say.
The New York Senator talks about the current chances of the LGBTQ+ legislation -- and how we can help pass it.
The House passed the LGBT-inclusive Senate version of a bill reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act by a bipartisan vote of 286-138.
The Senate attached hate-crimes legislation to a must-pass Pentagon spending bill Thursday, but opponents predicted it ultimately would fail. In a bipartisan vote of 60-39, the Senate accepted cloture, which ended debate on the bill, and then moved to approve the Matthew Shepard Act by a voice vote -- attaching it as an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2008 Department of Defense Authorization Bill. ''The president is not going to agree to this social legislation on the defense authorization bill,'' said Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. ''This bill will get vetoed.''
"We can be like the opposite of what happens in North Carolina."
The move has been called "discriminatory" by LGBTQ+ rights advocates.