By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Justices determined that the plaintiff was discriminated against for having "female genitalia" when the district "does not speculate, inspect, or otherwise inquire as to the genitalia of other male students.”
Two University of Texas professors are suing the Biden Administration for including transgender students in anti-discrimination policies.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled against an antiquated anti-abortion law, with justices issuing a scathing rebuke of the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision.
The updated rules enhance protections against discrimination based on sex, including for LGBTQ+ students, but leave the issue of transgender athletes’ participation in sports for further review.
Activists are demanding that California's Biola University and Oklahoma Baptist University withdraw waivers the schools requested to ignore Title IX protections against sex-based discrimination.
Patrice A. Harris, M.D., says the high court must protect all patients and all workers from anti-LGBTQ discrimination.
The cases both involve whether a ban on sex discrimination can extend to sexual orientation and gender identity.
This put the department at odds with another government agency in a hearing on a gay skydiving instructor's discrimination suit.
The administration laid out the argument in a brief filed Friday in a case the court will hear October 8.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act does cover sexual orientation discrimination, the Seventh Circuit rules, making it the highest court to arrive at this determination.
The attorney general says the Civil Rights Act of 1964 covers discrimination based on gender identity.
In a decision described by one legal expert as "game-changing," the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has ruled that existing federal law protects transgender individuals from sex discrimination on the basis of their gender identity.
The administration can't enforce its narrow definition of sex discrimination while lawsuits on the matter proceed.
A federal judge in D.C. blocks a Trump administration rule allowing anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination in health care.
The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled discrimination based on sexual orientation is not covered under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
The judges ruled the gay man had no case because there's no law in Missouri to protect people from discrimination for being gay.
The highest court in the U.S. will hear cases October 8 on whether existing federal civil rights law includes LGBTQ people within its protections.
Title VII is a huge victory for LGBTQ+ employees and shouldn't be undermined, but the Equality Act is the big kahuna.
Gerald Bostock's case is one of three the high court will hear Tuesday on whether anti-LGBTQ discrimination is legal.
