By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Human Rights Watch's Hala Maurice Guindy tells how LGBTQ+ individuals face ongoing human rights abuses in the Middle East and North Africa due to the criminalization of same-sex relations. Laws may seem vague, but they are used to persecute and harass. How can we ensure genuine equality and protection for all members of the LGBTQ+ community?
Across the Middle East and North Africa region, the criminalization of consensual same-sex relations and diverse gender expressions persists, subjecting LGBTQ+ individuals to widespread human rights abuses. Within this landscape, some countries do not have explicit laws targeting people with diverse sexual orientations, but that does not mean that they are safe or equal.
The fight to abandon laws that criminalize same-sex relations and ensure equality for all may overlook other oppressive practices employed by states to "legally" harass and prosecute LGBTQ+ individuals. A complex legal dynamic between criminalization and decriminalization unfolds, particularly evident in the cases of Egypt, Jordan, and Kuwait.
Alternative legal avenues, such as laws on public morality and evil, serve as tools for authorities to persecute and intimidate LGBTQ+ individuals. In Egypt, while consensual same-sex relations are not explicitly criminalized, vaguely defined laws related to public morality provide a pretext for discriminatory treatment. Article 178 of the Egyptian penal code, for instance, sanctions the creation or promotion of material deemed contrary to public morals, enabling the unjust targeting of the LGBTQ+ community. In 2017, Sarah Hegazy, an Egyptian writer and activist, was arrested with others after raising a rainbow flag at a concert in Cairo. Sarah was charged with inciting acts of evil and immorality.
She went to live in exile in Canada after being released. Sarah ended her life in 2020 after struggling with the mental and emotional impact of being abused in detention.
In Jordan, where consensual same-sex relations have been decriminalized since 1951, the absence of robust legal protections leaves the community vulnerable to state-sanctioned discrimination. Security forces use ambiguous morality laws and digital targeting tactics to target and harass them. Article 320 of Jordan's penal code, which penalizes indecent acts in public spaces, offers leeway for subjective interpretations. At the same time, recent cybercrime legislation further infringes on privacy and freedom of expression, creating another avenue for harassing or even prosecuting LGBTQ+ individuals. The law's vague provisions around promoting and inciting prostitution and sexual behavior, and inciting immorality, could be used to justify the prosecution of LGBT people in particular.
When security forces in Jordan entrapped a transgender woman in 2019, they searched her phone. They detained her pre-trial based on her photos. After enduring eight court hearings, she was released on bail.
In Kuwait, Article 198 of the penal code, which previously criminalized gender non-conformity, was overturned in February 2020. This initially signaled progress for transgender and non-binary rights. However, subsequent actions, such as mass deportations under the guise of "security" measures, underscore the ongoing threats to LGBTQ+ individuals in the country. Provisions within Kuwait's communications law, notably Article 70, pose further threats to freedom of expression and privacy, potentially exacerbating the vulnerability of individuals.
Criminalization of same-sex relations remains a legal hurdle, not only to ensuring equal access to justice and treatment for everyone but also to recognizing and respecting personal and sexual autonomy. The consequences of criminalization pose various challenges to guaranteeing universal human rights, such as the right to freedom of expression and association for LGBTQ+ individuals, in addition to allowing for prejudice to continue based on sexual orientation and gender identity and expression.
As activists and human rights defenders call on countries to abolish the criminalization of same-sex relations and repeal laws that are inherently discriminatory and abusive, it is of great importance to recognize that decriminalization is a mere legal procedure. If not grounded in clear and substantive measures to protect and provide legal remedies to those affected, it can still leave LGBTQ+ communities vulnerable to marginalization and prosecution. While decriminalization represents a fundamental protection practice and a significant step toward affirming the rights of LGBT people, the mere absence of punitive laws is insufficient to ensure genuine equality and protection. Implementation gaps and the misuse of existing legal frameworks continue to leave people exposed to discrimination and violence. Affirmative laws explicitly safeguarding against such abuses are imperative to foster a society where LGBT people are treated as equal members.
The decriminalization of same-sex relations should include all the necessary legislative measures that not only prohibit bias and discrimination but also guarantee accountability, justice, and protection from harmful and inhuman treatment.
Actual progress lies not only in decriminalization but in the establishment of comprehensive legal protections that safeguard the diversity of sexual orientations and gender identities and are grounded and guided by genuine respect for human rights and dignity.
Hala Maurice Guindy is a research assistant at Human Rights Watch.
Voices is dedicated to featuring a wide range of inspiring personal stories and impactful opinions from the LGBTQ+ and Allied community. Visit Advocate.com/submit to learn more about submission guidelines. We welcome your thoughts and feedback on any of our stories. Email us at voices@equalpride.com. Views expressed in Voices stories are those of the guest writers, columnists and editors, and do not directly represent the views of The Advocate or our parent company, equalpride.
